CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD001909020
1 mars 2022
or which may impede a prisoner’s re-settlement after release.
Page 24 sur 4434
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0103DEC003479803
3 janvier 2008
The search of the company’s premises was carried out from 21 May 2002, 9.50 a.m., until 22 May 2002, 10.00 a.m.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204699
25 août 2020
Some, because of their importance, may influence whether an order is or is not in fact made: others, the scope, nature or effect of that order.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC001906407
16 octobre 2012
Section 7(1) provides that a person who claims that a public authority gas acted in a way made unlawful by section 6(1) may bring proceedings against the authority.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC004551809
7 mars 2017
Subsequently, the domestic court made the same requests many times (between 2006 and 2009). 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD001789203
27 novembre 2012
180 dated 30 August 2005; no. 67 dated 6 May 2005; no. 72 dated 20 May 2005; no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0212DEC006392700
12 février 2004
On 31 May 1996, on the basis of the decision issued by the Sorrento Magistrate on 30 May 1991, the bailiff made an attempt to recover possession of the flat which proved unsuccessful, as the applicants
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1973:0718DEC000499171
18 juillet 1973
too many and too intemperate interruptions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0418DEC004046598
18 avril 2002
By a decision of 20 May 1992, which was made enforceable on 27 May 1992, the Naples Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 20 May 1993.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC001295802
2 octobre 2007
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD002366706
13 novembre 2008
The judgment was served on 9 May 2000. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0215DEC002822295
15 février 2000
Particular circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD005299908
20 décembre 2011
may have.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1015JUD004211698
15 octobre 2002
The Tribunal’s decision, dismissing the applicant’s claim, was given on 9 May 1989, and received by the applicant on 15 May 1989. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0512JUD002628912
12 mai 2015
2012, 14 May 2012 and 10 May 2012 respectively. 2.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:CR03186
29 novembre 2017
. ; "au visa du "mémoire régulièrement reçu par télécopie le 2 août 2017 à 8 heures 40 minutes au greffe de la chambre de l'instruction par Me Dominique Many, pour la défense de M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129JUD006036710
29 janvier 2013
I accept that he made his way to the UK and this may well have been over a six month period in a variety of modes of transport including a lorry.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0831DEC005255699
31 août 2004
The file was returned to the County Administrative Court on 3 May 1999.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1973:1218DEC000591372
18 décembre 1973
As a result of representations made on the applicant's behalf the Revenue Commissioners considered the matter again and made their final reply on .. August 1972.
ECLI:CEDH:001-168254
3 octobre 2016
V.P. disputed the claim, submitting that the book had been a product of literary creation made up of his subjective memories.