In this regard the Court first notes that the applicants have generally agreed with the Government that it might have been beneficial for their children in material terms to be placed in

In their view, the length of the proceedings was not unreasonable, given the number of judgments delivered and the court levels that had examined the case.

    The Government contested this argument.

    The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Nikolova, of the Ministry of Justice. 3.

The answer to this question will be decisive for the applicants’ complaint under this head. 50.

The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   V.A   Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice. A.

In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the

The copy of the Disbursement Order of the Federal Ministry of Justice (direction given to the competent Federal Cash Office to effect one single payment), suffices as proof of this payment.   2.

this could delay the criminal proceedings.

had wrongly based their decisions on police reports instead of on the findings of the hospital.

At the same time, they informed the court administering the Companies Register about their action and asked it not to allow the entry of the winding up of the company and the transfer of all its assets

Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as their admissibility. THE FACTS I.

The applicants requested the court to liquidate compensation for the occupation of the premises between 20 February 2008 [in their application to the ECtHR the applicants acknowledged that this date should

Having examined the applicants’ complaint that on 19 January 2005 their close relative was subjected to medical treatment against her will and that the authorities failed to react to this conduct, the

The Court for the first time addressed the dismissal of Church employees on grounds of conduct falling within the sphere of their private lives.

  1 to the Convention, in that the authorities failed to assist the applicants in recovering their property from third persons.

  1 that the domestic authorities had failed to uphold their ownership rights in the apartments and under Article   13 of the Convention that they had no effective remedies for this complaint

In the Court’s view, this indicates that the missing letter presented a detailed text which raised essentially the same issues as those submitted in the subsequent correspondence. 18 .

end attracts the protection of Article 8, as this choice is a form of expression of their private and family life.