Jur. ) practising in Kassel (Germany). The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A.

    In three notes verbales the Embassy of the Republic of Yemen informed the German Foreign Office that it considered that the applicant had been abducted from Yemen to Germany contrary to public

The County Court found in particular as follows:   “In his article, the applicant showed that the civil party P.D., as chairman of the Forum of Germans, had contacted a number of Romanian and German

, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands, the German Federal Office of Criminal Investigation (Bundeskriminalamt, hereinafter referred to as "BKA") at Wiesbaden, Germany, set up a transport company called Mertrans

Republic of Germany (FRG).

    The applicant company, a German limited company ( GmbH ), operates eight hard-coal-fired power plants ( Steinkohlekraftwerke , hereinafter “SKW”) in Germany.

  COMPLAINTS        The applicant association complains under Article 9 about the publication envisaged by the German Government.

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel, Ministerialdirigentin , of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two German nationals, Mr K.S. and Mrs M.S.

In 1996 the applicant was extradited to Germany from Lebanon and held in detention.

  The applicant’s situation in Germany The applicant immigrated to Germany in February 1987. His request for asylum was rejected.

He alleged, in particular, that the German courts had not had jurisdiction to convict him and that their wide interpretation of his crime had no basis in German or international law.

who was born in 1964 and lives in Pulheim (Germany).

born in 1941 and lives in Friedberg, Germany.

In affording just satisfaction to the applicant in a sum expressed in German marks, the Court intended that the compensation should be paid to him in that currency and in the Federal Republic of Germany

Germany (dec.) no. 53126/07, 29 May 2012, Garcia Cancio v. Germany (dec.) no.

Germany (no. 62198/11, §   86, 15 January 2015), and the decision of Garcia Cancio v. Germany (no. 19488/09, §§   26 ‑ 35, 29 May 2012).

This principle applies to the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of wrongs or damage caused by the German Reich (see   Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e  

        The Commission observes that the German authorities, when deciding to deport the applicant from Germany, relied on Section 47, Subsection 1, No. 1 and Section 49 of