Following that judgment, on 13 March 1997 the Privatisation Agency opened a procedure for the shop’s privatisation.

          The following members of the Commission were present when the Report was adopted.

    Neither applicant was dismissed following the investigations.

    At the following six hearings, the prison authorities again failed to bring the applicant before the court.

       Following a hearing in camera on 2 December 1994, the Regional Court dismissed the objection.

#Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Article 3 - Recovery of an export refund - 30-year limitation period - Limitation rule forming part of the

subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Application by the ECB of absorption interest pursuant to Austrian law where Article 395 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 has been infringed and following

  Luxembourg the Court found that Article   5 §   4 had been applicable following the revocation of a prisoner’s conditional release.

He alleged, in particular, that his son was unlawfully killed by the Turkish security forces in May 1994, following operations in the area.

After the village mayor told the Roma inhabitants to leave for their own safety, most of them fled that night and the rest on the following day. The protests continued in the following two weeks.

On 25 June 1997, the applicant who was at the time serving a three-year prison sentence following his conviction for drug-related offences, asked for his release on licence claiming that he could return

  Violations of Article 6 § 1 In the following 12 cases the applicants complained about the length of criminal proceedings against them.

xa0;    against the Federal Republic of Germany             The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on 2 July 1991, the following

Following the finding of the violation of Article 6 in the present case, an amendment of the Tyrolean Real Property Transaction Act adopted.

Between 20 August 2008 and September 2013 several decisions not to institute criminal proceedings following the applicant’s son’s death were adopted.

Malta - 64791/10 Judgment 17.7.2012 [Section IV] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Automatic and perpetual deprivation of parental rights following criminal conviction for ill-treatment of

Following a burglary, they were both dismissed.

eight Chamber judgments, of which only the friendly-settlement judgments are final. [1]       Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1   Violation of Article 6 § 1 In the following

In 1998 the applicant was registered as living in that flat and lived there with N. for the following fifteen years. They never married. In 2013 N. died. He did not have any heirs.