CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021DEC003711506
21 octobre 2008
Islande , arrêt du 25 juin 1992, série A n o 239, § 63, et Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas c. Norvège [GC], n o 21980/93, § 62, CEDH 1999-III).
Page 24 sur 123
TRIBUNAL_UE
ECLI:EU:T:2025:146
12 février 2025
#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung einer Unionsbildmarke mit der Darstellung eines Blattes – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Fehlende Unterscheidungskraft – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 207/2009
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1023JUD001488803
23 octobre 2008
The anti-narcotics unit is also to be blamed for the deaths of 39 persons who died last year by overdose and for the easy access to drugs of each school student in Oryol.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0413DEC004993320
13 avril 2021
Specifically it must determine whether the nationwide blanket lockdown imposed by the Romanian authorities – and which the applicant, by his account, was required to heed – amounted to a deprivation of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0408JUD002020104
8 avril 2010
the United Kingdom at issue in the judgment in the Hirst case differs decisively from the one in Austria that is relevant here: section 22 of the National Assembly Election Act does not provide for blanket
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0328DEC003377620
28 mars 2023
It is further relevant, in this regard, that A.M. was a private individual and not a journalist, media or non-governmental organisation with a public watchdog function (contrast Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD002757003
21 décembre 2010
The trial court held that in paragraph 47 the author wrongly blamed Mr S. and Mr B. for stopping the funding, because the structure of off-budget funds was regulated by federal government decision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0729JUD002282404
29 juillet 2008
reporting on issues of general interest is subject to the proviso that they are acting in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the ethics of journalism (see Bladet
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0222JUD003746402
22 février 2007
(see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 68, ECHR 1999 ‑ III). The Court, like the domestic authorities, is not convinced by this argument.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1120DEC006193000
20 novembre 2003
As to his own conduct, the applicant submitted that he could not be blamed for having used all legal remedies available to him and that he had not contributed to the length of the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC002508309
10 mai 2011
Each man blamed the other for placing the package in the car and denied all knowledge of it.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-213137
15 octobre 2021
colluding or absconding; - failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention/house arrest; - economic crime (Art. 108 § 1.1 of the CPC was not applied with the blanket
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1128DEC002399594
28 novembre 1994
The constant amendment of the applicable transfer criteria discloses a policy of blanket refusal of transfers for Republicans. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0319JUD000791010
19 mars 2013
The temperature in the cell was not adequate because the window was broken; in winter the detainees covered it with a blanket. 13.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409JUD002054414
9 avril 2026
On 31 October 2012 the applicant was formally charged with hooliganism and illegal possession of a bladed weapon. 5 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC004688507
27 septembre 2011
In this context the Court recalls that although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must accept
ECLI:CEDH:001-109444
12 décembre 2011
The leaflets blamed the Russian authorities for extreme poverty of the Russian population and high prices, whereas the State received considerable benefits from selling oil abroad.
CASELAW;STATEMENTOFFACTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3784098-4330437
9 janvier 2012
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3130633-3471579
20 mai 2010
The applicant had lost his right to vote as a result of the imposition of an automatic, blanket restriction on the franchise of those under partial guardianship.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327DEC000772107
27 mars 2012
The Court notes in this connection that, although the applicants cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to them under domestic law in order to protect their interests, they must accept that such