CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-154430
15 avril 2015
The attackers saw him entering the grocery store, followed him inside but failed to find him there. They then blocked all the exits of the store, hoping to capture him eventually. 25.
Page 24 sur 215
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC001423207
6 décembre 2011
Unidentified civilians are listed as victims of three attacks. 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912DEC007456616
12 septembre 2023
Realising that Mataghis was not under attack, they went back to sleep.
JEX
686d744ea2273490db10c033
3 juillet 2025
JUILLET 2025 COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL PRESIDENT : Cécile CROCHET GREFFIER : Marie-Christine YATIM DEMANDERESSE Madame [S] [O] [L] épouse [I] [Adresse 1] [Localité 6] représentée par Me Aline ATIBACK
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68054-68522
10 novembre 1999
Similar attacks followed on its successor, Özgur Ülke .
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-908
15 juin 2010
Both his own and his lawyer’s numerous requests for him to receive medical assistance and to be transferred to hospital were ignored until in July 2004 he had a heart attack.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9461
27 mai 2014
It may therefore prove necessary to protect that confidence against destructive attacks which are essentially unfounded, especially in view of the fact that judges who have been criticised are subject
ECLI:CEDH:001-249486
2 mars 2026
applicant lodged a criminal complaint listing multiple physical assaults perpetrated against her by her father in 2018 (when she was 17 years old), psychological violence, including threats and verbal attacks
ECLI:CEDH:001-218528
20 juin 2022
The individual applicants complain, among other incidents, about violent attacks and threats against the LGBT community and individual applicants by ultraconservative groups which held anti-LGBT rallies
ECLI:CEDH:002-1621
5 mars 2009
They subsequently lodged a complaint with the minor-offences court, which initially found the attackers guilty of insulting the applicant and fined them.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1407
16 juillet 2009
Fostering the exclusion of foreigners was a fundamental attack on their rights, and everyone – including politicians – should exercise particular caution.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7598
27 juin 2013
Law – Article 3: While the international reports on Iraq attested to a continuing difficult situation, including indiscriminate and deadly attacks by violent groups, and discrimination and heavy-handed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1219DEC005795000
19 décembre 2002
The attack on Katyr-Yurt In autumn 1999 the Russian military forces started hostilities in Chechnya.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD006833510
The Board further could not see any reasonable explanation for the alleged attack against the applicant’s parents, thereby questioning the credibility of this allegation.
ECLI:CEDH:001-147723
6 octobre 2014
The acid attack on the applicant and the authorities’ response On 29 July 2009 the applicant suffered grievous injuries in an acid attack by an unidentified assailant.
ECLI:CEDH:001-188229
14 novembre 2018
MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged lack of fairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant who was convicted of illegal possession of weapons, preparation for terrorist attack
ECLI:CEDH:001-249118
13 février 2026
on 13 February 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s compulsory psychiatric internment ordered in the framework of criminal proceedings in connection with a knife attack
ECLI:CEDH:001-216985
25 mars 2022
He was removed together with several other migrants after allegedly being subjected to dog attacks and beatings inflicted by or in the presence of Hungarian officers executing the removal.
ECLI:CEDH:001-250351
29 avril 2026
Invoking Article 6, the applicant argues that did not have a fair hearing since in his case the collateral attack on the trial judge’s ruling was not such as could justify the draconian step of striking
ECLI:CEDH:002-12870
25 juin 2020
regard to the fact that the applicant had specifically complained about his criminal conviction for defamation of I.P., and that the domestic courts had considered the case from the perspective of an attack