James and Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC, lawyers practising in London, and Mr M. Mustafayev, a lawyer practising in Baku.

On the same day the investigator questioned him again, now as an accused, in the presence of his lawyer. The applicant reiterated his previous statement.

IARD URSSAF LANGUEDOC ROUSSILLON OCIANE MUTUELLE CPAM DE L'HÉRAULT Copie exécutoire délivrée le 16 janvier 2025 à : - Me Laurence Jacques Ferri - Me Emmanuelle Vajou - Me Clothilde Lamy

Mutuelle MMA VIE ASSURANCES MUTUELLES C/ [E] [U] Mutuelle CGPA Copie exécutoire délivrée le 03 juillet 2025 à : Me Philippe Pericchi Me Sylvie Sergent Me Clotilde Lamy

JUDICIAIRE DE NARBONNE 03 avril 2023 RG:21/01262 [C] C/ [Z] Copie exécutoire délivrée le 10 juillet 2025 à : Me Jean-Michel Divisia Me Clotilde Lamy

Postică , a lawyer practising in Chișinău.

The applicant’s lawyer was absent, as the law did not provide for the attendance of a lawyer at any investigative act (see paragraph 59 below).

solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } THIRD SECTION Applications nos. 4769/10 and 54110/09 Alexsander

Pietrzak, a lawyer practising in Warsaw. 2.     The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Ms J. Chrzanowska and subsequently, by Mr J.

That court had exonerated the applicant from the court fee but ultimately ordered him to reimburse the costs of the lawyer of the respondent winning party.

width:153.78pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 50253/18 Tânia Alexandra

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 28102/16 Alexandru

  Finogenov, a lawyer practising in Moscow. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.

Marta Bulhosa, a lawyer practising in Lisbon, and Mr. V. Carreto, a lawyer practising in Torres Vedras.

Citing financial difficulties, she refused the offer and asked the authorities to assign another public lawyer for the applicant. 13.

He was represented before the Court by Mr   Vokoun, a lawyer practising in Kladno. The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A.

Broch, a lawyer practising in Gibraltar. The respondent Government are represented by their Agent Mr M. Falk of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

Bucharest Court of Appeal, 24/11/2011   24/11/2011   28/09/2012 10 months and 5 days       46310/14 16/06/2014 Pavel Drumuș 11/02/1932   represented by Rodica Iacob, a lawyer

Serrarens, a lawyer practising in Maastricht. The Netherlands Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Mr R.A.A. Böcker and Ms J.