CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0620JUD003951098
20 juin 2006
Its Article 250, in its relevant part, reads: “1. Detention on remand shall be imposed by a court order. 2.
Page 23 sur 5792
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1009DEC003951098
9 octobre 2003
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113JUD000377217
13 novembre 2025
the reopening of the proceedings against him with the Diyarbakır Fourth Assize Court (“the trial court”), which had special jurisdiction to hear cases relating to the aggravated crimes specified in Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0704JUD002791595
4 juillet 2000
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0109JUD002587494
9 janvier 2001
Article 217: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0213JUD000332419
13 février 2024
On 25 May 1998 the public prosecutor at the Istanbul State Security Court filed a bill of indictment charging certain people, including the applicant, V.Ç. and M.K., under Article 146 of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD003971216
28 novembre 2023
indictment against a number of persons, including the applicants, with the Diyarbakır Sixth Assize Court, which had special jurisdiction to hear cases relating to the aggravated crimes specified in Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD006976212
16 février 2021
public prosecutor’s office based on the police report of 13 March 2007, a judge assigned to the İzmir Assize Court, which had special jurisdiction to try a number of aggravated crimes enumerated in Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0720JUD001709502
20 juillet 2010
possession of explosives (Article 234 § 1), attempts at aggravated murder (Articles 16 § 2, 105 §§ 2, 4, 8, 13), and destruction of property (Article 278 § 2).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD002834911
19 octobre 2021
December 2007 the first hearing was held before the Malatya 3rd Assize Court (hereinafter “the trial court”), which had special jurisdiction to try a number of aggravated offences listed in Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120JUD005542110
20 novembre 2012
Article 250 deals with abusive behaviour and provides that a public servant on duty who uses insulting language while physically harming someone shall be punished by six months to five years
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0716JUD003981507
16 juillet 2009
According to Article 250 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a supplementary judgment could be issued only if the court had omitted to rule in respect of a claim made by one of the parties to the proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0412JUD001206012
12 avril 2016
According to Article 250 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP), an accused person may not acquaint him or herself with the prosecution file until the end of the criminal prosecution.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0416JUD002201810
16 avril 2013
According to Article 250 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused person may only acquaint him or herself with the prosecution file at the end of the criminal prosecution.
2ème et 7ème sous-sections réunies
CETAT:CETATEXT000020868679
23 avril 2009
Yvon F à la requête du PREFET DE L'AVEYRON : Considérant qu'aux termes de l'article L. 250-1 du code électoral : Le tribunal administratif peut, en cas d'annulation d'une élection pour manoeuvres dans
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD006435614
7 février 2017
The relevant provisions of the former Romanian Criminal Code concerning abusive behaviour read: Article 250 “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD004177506
5 juin 2012
Article 250 of the Romanian Criminal Code on abusive behaviour provides that a public servant on duty who uses insulting language while physically harming a person may be punished by six
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD007652112
9 mars 2021
(c) In articles published in the 25 January 2007 issues of the daily newspapers Milliyet and Vatan , quoting an article written by [the applicant] and published on a website accessible to lawyers, he stated
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD002941409
27 janvier 2015
20 in conjunction with Articles 174 and 175(i) of the Criminal Code. 19.
cr
61372602cd580146774223cf
4 novembre 1999
douze ans de réclusion criminelle et à dix ans d'interdiction des droits civiques, civils et de famille ; Vu le mémoire produit ; Sur le premier moyen de cassation, pris de la violation des articles