Indeed, the applicant’s complaint itself pertains to the alleged medical negligence in the treatment provided to her mother.

The Court is prepared to accept that this decisive fact “could not reasonably have been expected to be known” to the Government, which became aware of the second applicant’s death in October 2024 (see

It found that the applicant, in breach of his statutory duties, had failed to maintain proper accounting records and to submit the required financial statements to the tax authorities.

Harea, a lawyer practising in Chișinău; the decision to give notice of the application to the Moldovan Government (“the Government”), represented by their former Agent, Mr D.

The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

It further observed that the document had been handed to the applicant in reply to his own request to have the interview with the police rescheduled to enable him to gather evidence and to present his

no legal basis to set the impugned decision aside. 5 .

gave thorough answers to their arguments (see paragraphs 7 and 8 above). 15.

On 27 January 2004 the Malatia-Sebastia District Court of Yerevan found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to seven years in prison.

    The trial before the first instance court was assigned to Judge I.C.B. who, before the start of the proceedings, requested to withdraw from the case in order to eliminate any suspicion concerning

However, the right of access to a court is not absolute and may be subject to limitations that do not restrict or reduce the access left to an individual in such a way or to such an extent that the very

She was sentenced to a fine of 1,950   euros (EUR) and ordered to pay damages to the civil party in the proceedings (“the victim”), jointly with the remaining defendants, in the amount of EUR  

According to the news item, the LGBT community were not frightened to participate and trusted that the police would protect them during the march to be organised by the applicant organisation.

access to a court and to a fair trial.

THE LAW Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The applicant was not invited to the hearing.

to the peaceful enjoyment of her possessions protected by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. 14.

an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive adequate and