The dormitory had two bathrooms. The first one had three sinks and two toilets and the second one had four sinks and three toilets. There was also a separate shower room. Section no.

It was evident from the decision that the applicant had not sufficiently demonstrated in his complaint how his fundamental rights had been infringed and that the Constitutional Court had been unable to

For the reasons given, the court was satisfied that the United Kingdom had not deliberately misled the Swiss authorities, that it had always made its intentions clear and that there had been no improper

He also complained that he had had no effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. 4.

    The applicant also submitted that in detention he had never received a visit from a pastor and had had no opportunity to pray in private, as he had never been left alone.

  Furthermore, the applicant had only her secondary residence in Kirchdorf and was staying there during weekends so that she merely had the intention to acquire a holiday residence.

parcel no. 2. 4.

It noted that the Supreme Board had taken into consideration the expert opinion, but had not given the applicant the opportunity to comment.

not had legal assistance at the interrogation.

She mixed it with cannabis she already had at home and packed it into three separate plastic bags, then wrapped them together in one parcel. 8.

It found that the applicant was not the owner of the land as he had neither inherited it nor acquired it by prescription.

The investigator had therefore exceeded his authority and had incorrectly interpreted the law by imposing detention.

She confirmed that the applicant had requested visits. Although her requests had been refused, the applicant had managed to see her child on 1 and 12 August 2012.

The applicant also stated that some of the detainees who had occasionally shared the cell with him had had contagious diseases, such as hepatitis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or had been drug

211 / Mme Isabelle IS..., demeurant 3, place Lorin, 94240 L'Hay-les-Roses, 212 / Mme Laurence IU..., demeurant ..., 213 / Mme AV...

As of 4 October 2011 he had seen a dentist nine times during his imprisonment and had been provided with psychiatric treatment, particularly since he had had a history of such treatment even before his

III, 2 avril 2003, pourvoi n° 01-14.446) que les consorts X..., au motif qu'ils étaient titulaires d'un bail, depuis 1981, sur des parcelles appartenant à M.

On 4 March 2009 the parcel was returned to the applicant's counsel.

  14224/15 and 50977/15, 15 April 2020) it has examined similar applications as the ones in the present case and declared them inadmissible considering that the applicants had lost their victim status