CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0622JUD006151314
22 juin 2017
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation)
Page 23 sur 763
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0706JUD007945713
6 juillet 2017
The applicant complained that his preventive detention beyond the former statutory ten-year maximum duration had breached his right to liberty as provided in Article 5 § 1 of the Convention
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12158
22 octobre 2018
Denmark [GC] - 35553/12, 36678/12 and 36711/12 Judgment 22.10.2018 [GC] Article 5 Article 5-1 Deprivation of liberty Article 5-1-c Reasonably necessary to prevent offence Detention of football supporters
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1022JUD003555312
secure the person’s presence for the time being or to prevent his association with others. ... (4) No arrest may be made if, in the nature of the case or the circumstances in general, deprivation of liberty
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0716JUD001103712
16 juillet 2015
As to all of these complaints, they alleged a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0428JUD001525911
28 avril 2015
following his request for release of May 2009, the lawfulness of his detention had not been decided speedily, as provided in Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD002057104
30 juillet 2009
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918JUD001745511
18 septembre 2012
Everyone has the right to liberty and security (Article 22 § 1). Detention is permissible only on the basis of a court order.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:C300371
25 juin 2020
d'un nouveau tableau d'amortissement du prêt, alors : « 1°/ que, dans leurs « conclusions en réponse 1 » notifiées à la société BNP Paribas Personal Finance devant le tribunal de grande instance de Libourne
Cour d'Appel
6253ca89bd3db21cbdd8b49f
15 mai 2008
Christophe né le 27 Février 1975 à LIBOURNE (33) Fils de X... Christian et de PICARD Josiane De nationalité française Célibataire demeurant...
6ème Chambre
DTA_2101268_20230306
6 mars 2023
Article 2 : Le centre hospitalier de Libourne versera au syndicat A 33 la somme de 800 euros au titre de l'article L. 761-1 du code de justice administrative.
6253c880bd3db21cbdd856f3
12 juin 2001
Cette situation a conduit la présidente du tribunal de grande instance de LIBOURNE désigner un administrateur provisoire , Monsieur G... puis (depuis le 1er octobre 1999 Monsieur François A....
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD002207710
5 mars 2013
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114JUD007172310
14 janvier 2014
of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD007298610
6 octobre 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120JUD006462713
20 janvier 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0216JUD007715313
16 février 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1005JUD002997814
5 octobre 2023
Its key purpose is to prevent arbitrary or unjustified deprivation of liberty (see Buzadji v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0601JUD006281917
1 juin 2021
Dutch-speaking Division) partly upheld the first applicant’s claim under Articles 1382 and 1383 of the Civil Code for compensation in respect of damage sustained as a result of his deprivation of liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD006867817
10 novembre 2022