Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-101
11 avril 1997
11 avril 1997
Germany (1), The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 para. 2 (art. 48-2) of the Convention for the Protection
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194936
2 juillet 2019
2 juillet 2019
authorities in Germany, in person before the trial court (see, for general principles, Al-Khawaja and Tahery v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-163513
12 mai 2016
12 mai 2016
font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } Communicated on 12 May 2016 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 58681/12 T.C.E. against Germany
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419DEC005430713
19 avril 2016
19 avril 2016
23 August 2013, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Markus Thumm, is a German
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0221DEC002470514
21 février 2017
21 février 2017
The applicants are Turkish nationals and live in Mannheim, Germany. They were represented before the Court by Mr H. Salan, a lawyer practising in Mannheim.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-391
6 septembre 2011
6 septembre 2011
Under German law, he would have become eligible for conditional release after serving fifteen years, but he was subsequently transferred, without his consent, to serve the remainder of his sentence in
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0414DEC001169707
14 avril 2000
14 avril 2000
.sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 11697/07 by Werner WOHLMANN and Gabriele WOHLMANN against Germany
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330JUD003233807
30 mars 2010
30 mars 2010
law as both parties had stronger links to France than to Germany. 4.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68031-68499
25 novembre 1998
25 novembre 1998
GERMANY AND BEER AND REGAN v. GERMANY Wednesday 25 November at 9.30 a.m. The applicants The cases concern two applications.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0525DEC003759297
25 mai 1999
25 mai 1999
In 1990, before Germany’s reunification, which came into effect on 3 October 1990, he moved to Potsdam in the German Democratic Republic (GDR) with the intention of setting up a tax consultancy there although
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0624DEC002952695
24 juin 1996
24 juin 1996
He considers that following the German unification in 1990 there was no legal basis for punishment in respect of espionage on behalf of the former German Democratic Republic.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0122DEC001693705
22 janvier 2008
22 janvier 2008
The applicant complained about the length of the proceedings before the German family courts.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49211
5 mai 1971
5 mai 1971
xa0; Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged by Heinz Jentzsch, a German
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1503847-1573086
9 novembre 2005
9 novembre 2005
GERMANY The European Court of Human Rights is holding a Grand Chamber hearing today Wednesday 9 November 2005 at 9 a.m., in the case of Surmeli v. Germany (application no. 75529/01).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1031DEC005841017
31 octobre 2017
31 octobre 2017
Germany (no. 5398/03, 2 February 2006, see also Jung v. Germany (dec.), no. 5643/07, 29 September 2009). COMPLAINTS 9.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1516520-1586585
23 novembre 2005
23 novembre 2005
GERMANY The European Court of Human Rights is holding a Grand Chamber hearing today 23 November 2005 at 9 a.m. in the case of Jalloh v. Germany (application no. 54810/00).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110DEC002473304
10 novembre 2009
10 novembre 2009
The applicant’s life in Germany The applicant came from Bulgaria to Germany on 15 January 1992 and settled in Offenburg. On 28 January 1994 he married a German national, Ms E.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC004653108
16 octobre 2012
16 octobre 2012
Germany [GC], no. 9300/07, §§ 27-32, 26 June 2012.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1215DEC003483018
15 décembre 2020
15 décembre 2020
Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ VII; more recently, Fröhlich v. Germany , no. 16741/16, 24 January 2019).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0128JUD006548010
28 janvier 2016
28 janvier 2016
National Minorities in the Federal Republic of Germany are the Danes of German citizenship and the members of the Sorbian people with German citizenship.
Source officiellePage 23 sur 630