The court also maintained the applicant’s detention during the trial without giving any grounds.

He was already in prison during the criminal proceedings against him, as he had been convicted of another crime.

COMPLAINT The applicant complains that his caging during lawyer visits in Moscow remand prison IZ-77/9 was contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.   QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

Given the safeguards that existed during the period, the applicant’s situation was not comparable to that of a person on death row.

(b)     If so, was the deprivation of liberty during the above period “lawful” and not arbitrary?

During the second trial, the victim gave several interviews to national newspapers on the subject in which the experience of giving evidence during the trial was discussed.

There is no possibility to use toilet during the transfer. 2.

On 9 December 2003 the presiding judge received a copy of the above decision and read it out during the trial.

The life prisoners submit that they are affected by the strict regime of imprisonment, applied to them during the first ten years of post ‑ conviction detention.

    The Government submitted that during the entire period under consideration the applicant had had more than 3 sq. m of personal space.

According to the last report, the applicant noted that he had not been subjected to any ill-treatment during his police custody.

During the night of violence, more than 250 people were killed and more than 2,500   were injured. 5.

    During the course of the subsequent trial stage, the first-instance courts, ruling either at the end of the hearings or at reviews carried out between the hearings, ordered the applicants

E., who had chosen to defend himself, cross-examined the applicant during six days in the course of the proceedings.

July 2010 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

November 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

Turkey (referral) - 36391/02 Judgment 26.4.2007 [Section II] Article 6 Article 6-3-c Defence through legal assistance Lack of legal assistance during police custody: case referred to the Grand Chamber

April 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

November 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

    Were the procedures concerning the periodic review of the applicant’s further detention in an institution for mentally ill offenders during the period between 2010 and 2013 “in accordance