CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607JUD000164102
7 juin 2007
On 24 December 1999 the general shareholders' meeting of the applicant company adopted a new memorandum of association.
Page 22 sur 238
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114348
12 octobre 2012
Moreover, the applicants had shares in two other flats in Ulan-Ude.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002906995
15 mai 1996
The administrative proceedings began with a meeting on 2 February 1990.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0424JUD002581912
24 avril 2025
The law allowed him to claim this share, which he had failed to do. 12.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC004229698
6 juillet 1999
These customers were all non-Portuguese and the shares were first sent to Switzerland and then from Switzerland to the customers.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC003266796
23 octobre 1997
They proposed that a residual tax be imposed on the hidden dividend, i.e. the entire sum of FIM 1,944,444, which the applicant had obtained for his partnership share.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0903DEC007658116
3 septembre 2024
As regards the SFRY’s assets, the successor States determined their respective shares in the Succession Agreement they signed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0514DEC006633601
14 mai 2002
This complaint must therefore be rejected as manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 34 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0718JUD005587000
18 juillet 2006
She further maintained that she had never objected to holding court hearings in the absence of the defendant and even requested the court to hold the hearings despite such absence. 55.
ECLI:CEDH:001-193395
29 avril 2019
Skopje Court of Appeal and learning of the composition of its panel, the applicant company requested reopening of the proceedings for recognition claiming that the husband of a member of that panel had shares
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD001559203
8 janvier 2009
A meeting of creditors was held on 31 October 2002. 47.
ECLI:CEDH:001-115221
13 novembre 2012
She is represented before the Court by Ms J. Barić, an advocate practising in Rijeka. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD005111107
14 janvier 2020
She made a handwritten note on the form, stating that she had been coerced into signing the form and that she had not been given access to the documents in case file no. 18/432766-07.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0928JUD000406521
28 septembre 2023
The court also threatened M.M. with a fine of 3,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) for each cancelled contact meeting.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1013JUD000187005
13 octobre 2016
V.S. again arrived in the flat, when the applicant was in it, and demanded that she surrender her share.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0321JUD001010320
21 mars 2024
They further contended that the meetings diaries of the President and the Vice ‑ President of the Constitutional Court did not constitute public information within the meaning of the domestic law
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0130DEC005305021
30 janvier 2024
him “his share” the following day.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0226DEC003766404
26 février 2008
The wind turbine was owned by the “Hästholmen Joint Wind Association” ( Hästholmens Vindsamfällighets-föreningen ), which consisted of 1,261 shares, of which the municipality owned 100 shares and several
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215JUD002546405
15 décembre 2009
On the same day the applicant appealed, referring to the absence of an audio record of the meeting and the statement by one of the three witnesses regarding the absence of any insulting meaning
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD006149608
12 janvier 2016
The transcript also contained five short messages that the applicant had exchanged with his fiancée on 12 July 2007 using a personal Yahoo Messenger account; these messages did not disclose any intimate