CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

868 résultats pour « Sebastien TO »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217203

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2022

8 avril 2022

  917/2017) to receive specific allowances in addition to their salaries, allowances which were meant to compensate for the “dangerous working conditions” in which they were working.

Page 22 sur 44

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516JUD003562116

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2024

16 mai 2024

an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicant, allowing him to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive adequate and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516DEC004944121

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2024

16 mai 2024

THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123DEC002458121

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2025

23 janvier 2025

The Government undertakes to provide adequate redress to the Applicant in respect of the violation referred to above.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205DEC000647225

Admin. suprême

5 février 2026

5 février 2026

referring to the application for review.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0909DEC002606519

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2021

9 septembre 2021

THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0926JUD004060417

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2024

26 septembre 2024

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Ara Harutyunyan, cited above, § 66), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0202DEC005377720

Admin. suprême

2 février 2023

2 février 2023

THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1015JUD004075606

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2024

15 octobre 2024

have been known to that party, request the Court, within a period of six months after that party acquired knowledge of that fact, to revise that judgment. ...” 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202184

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2020

5 mars 2020

Cases Date of the decision 15362/09 Sylwester BIEŃKOWSKI 21/05/2019 20029/18 Piotr WAWRZELSKI 18/06/2019 29657/17 Sebastian BARAN 21/05/2019 34418/18 Grażyna OLEWIŃSKA AND Janusz OLEWIŃSKI 18/06/2019 4003

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-191108

Admin. suprême

6 février 2019

6 février 2019

the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1002DEC003106416

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2025

2 octobre 2025

The Court, which is the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, finds that the complaint at issue falls to be examined solely under the procedural aspect of Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC007552916

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2019

25 juin 2019

    Background to the facts giving rise to the applications 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831DEC002397222

Admin. suprême

31 août 2023

31 août 2023

no. 266/2005 of 23   December 2005) to pending national proceedings were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0326JUD003183220

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2024

26 mars 2024

With a view to harmonising its procedure with the case-law of this Court, in 2021 the Constitutional Court decided to start transmitting all observations to the appellants for comments.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711DEC004064122

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2024

11 juillet 2024

Răduleţu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 12   August 2022, Having regard to the declaration submitted by the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1126DEC005431316

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2024

26 novembre 2024

Prison or to another detention facility, located closer to his family’s residence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221856

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2022

21 novembre 2022

They sought placement in the professional grade corresponding to their full length of service from the date of the transfer as well as the determination of any compensation due to them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130DEC000056819

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2021

30 novembre 2021

Lastly, the court referred to the severe penalty to which the applicant was liable. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1003DEC000701120

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2024

3 octobre 2024

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

Source officielle