CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

44 289 résultats pour « Rula »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC000664310

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2010

14 décembre 2010

39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government

Page 22 sur 2215

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174343

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2017

15 mai 2017

25; Internal Rules for Remand Centres, Rule 66).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0828JUD001034603

Admin. suprême

28 août 2018

28 août 2018

sit as an ad hoc judge (Rule   29   §   2 of the Rules of the Court). 3 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123DEC002983619

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2023

23 novembre 2023

Draft declarations setting out a friendly-settlement proposal were sent to the parties by the Court’s Registry on 17 July 2019 and the applicant was informed, with reference to Rule 62 § 2 of the Rules

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0120JUD007055714

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2026

20 janvier 2026

Done in English, and notified in writing on 20 January 2026, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161763

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2016

2 mars 2016

under the 1998 Rules.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68002-68470

Admin. suprême

23 février 1999

23 février 1999

  46221/99) lodged by Abdullah ÖCALAN against Turkey and in particular a request by his lawyers that the Court indicate interim measures to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410DEC007170210

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

  39 of the Rules of Court).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9197

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2013

1 octobre 2013

The Government claimed that the application to the Court had not complied with Rule   47 of the Rules of Court and with paragraph   11 of the Practice Direction on the Institution of Proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192150

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2019

7 mars 2019

The Court further decided to give priority to the application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192868

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2019

3 avril 2019

The Court further decided to give priority to the application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710DEC006420811

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2012

10 juillet 2012

The President granted the applicant’s request for his identity not to be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 3).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324DEC002261521

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2022

24 mars 2022

39 of the Rules of Court, that he should not be removed to Malta.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0317DEC002904314

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2015

17 mars 2015

The President granted the applicants’ request for their identity not to be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court). They are represented before the Court by Mr F.-W.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304DEC007681413

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

On 9 December 2013 the President of the Section to which the case has been allocated applied the requested measure and ordered that, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, the applicant should not be expelled

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703DEC001477818

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2018

3 juillet 2018

39 of the Rules of Court).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC003903003

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2009

29 septembre 2009

Under Rule 37 § 1 of the Rules, communications addressed to their advocates are deemed to have been addressed to them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0830DEC000337306

Admin. suprême

30 août 2007

30 août 2007

On the same day, the Acting President also decided to apply Rule 40 of the Rules of Court (urgent notification of an application) to the present case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0716JUD000165916

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2020

16 juillet 2020

They accordingly requested the revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1024JUD003375105

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2017

24 octobre 2017

They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4 .

Source officielle