AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1130DEC005350799
30 novembre 2004
30 novembre 2004
According to the Union, the clause served an important purpose in that it protected a weaker party from being forced to abandon the status of an employee covered by the social-security system and become
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1202DEC005595500
2 décembre 2004
2 décembre 2004
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1209DEC001488803
9 décembre 2004
9 décembre 2004
It found that the applicant had been duly notified of the hearing by phone, which was a valid method of summoning a party under the Russian Code of Civil Procedure.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1214DEC005991300
14 décembre 2004
14 décembre 2004
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1214DEC003100802
14 décembre 2004
14 décembre 2004
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1214DEC001485803
14 décembre 2004
14 décembre 2004
Challenging the making and implementation of a care order An aggrieved party may appeal the making of a care order to the court on the basis that it was not justified in the circumstances, for example,
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0902DEC006156400
2 septembre 2004
2 septembre 2004
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0909DEC005407100
9 septembre 2004
9 septembre 2004
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0916DEC003013802
16 septembre 2004
16 septembre 2004
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0916DEC005950200
16 septembre 2004
16 septembre 2004
Where the court granted the complaint, the injured party could bring separate proceedings for the return of the unlawfully imposed fine or confiscated items.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705DEC003000302
5 juillet 2005
5 juillet 2005
On 15 June 2000 the Senior Disciplinary Board at the Ministry for Public Service and Sport ( Disziplinaroberkommission beim Bundesministerium für öffentliche Leistung und Sport ) partly dismissed the applicant's
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0830DEC004362602
30 août 2005
30 août 2005
The applicant, represented by a lawyer, was fully able to present his case and challenge the evidence of the other party, public hearings were held and the courts’ decisions were satisfactorily reasoned
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0908DEC003841102
8 septembre 2005
8 septembre 2005
Article 57 provides that extradition shall not take place if the person whose extradition is sought has the nationality of the requested Contracting Party.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0908DEC001493903
8 septembre 2005
8 septembre 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0929DEC005156299
29 septembre 2005
29 septembre 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011DEC000435303
11 octobre 2005
11 octobre 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011DEC006068200
11 octobre 2005
11 octobre 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0903DEC004318598
3 septembre 2002
3 septembre 2002
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0905DEC005826300
5 septembre 2002
5 septembre 2002
The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about his inability to obtain execution of a final judgment against the State, partly
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0905DEC004067298
5 septembre 2002
5 septembre 2002
court as guaranteed by Article 6 also protects the implementation of final, binding judicial decisions, which, in States that accept the rule of law, cannot remain inoperative to the detriment of one party
Source officiellePage 22 sur 633