Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26   June   2007; and Sulwińska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03).

Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26   June   2007; and Sulwińska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03).

Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII. COMPLAINTS 1.

Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26   June   2007; and Sulwińska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03).

Poland (dec.), no. 47414/99, 9 October 2003) The Court observes that it is true that for lodging such an interlocutory appeal the applicant would have been required to pay a court fee.

Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03; §§ 37-43).

Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26   June   2007; and Sulwińska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03).

Slovakia (dec.), no. 50237/99, 27 September 2001).

Romania (dec.), nos. 31390/18 and 9   others, §§ 54-55, 7 March 2023), complied with by the domestic courts?   3.

Slovakia (dec.), no. 37895/97, 1   February 2001).

Slovakia (dec.), no. 23788/06, 18 September 2007). This above list is not exhaustive. 40.

Romania (dec.), no.

In the case of Deák and Others v.

né le 5 Septembre 1943 à BEAUPOUVET (24) Madame Nicole Y... épouse X...

  Poland (dec.), no. 1427/03, 23 January 2007).

  Moldova (dec.), no. 31413/03, 28 February 2006). Accordingly, the application must be rejected as being manifestly ill-founded, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

Poland , (dec), no. 36860/98, 1 June 1999). Consequently, his complaint under Article 7 is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

Russia (dec.) no.   55531/00, 9 November 2004).

Poland (dec.), no. 34052/96, 15   February   2001 and Labita v. Italy , judgment of 6   April 2000, Reports   of   Judgments and Decisions 2000-IV, §   152).

Application no. 7656/02 by Liliya Vladimirovna KOLENOVA against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 20   June 2006 as a Chamber composed of:   Sir   Nicolas