This judgment was overturned by Belgrade Court of Appeal on 19   March   2014. 40 .     On 13   May   2014 the applicant lodged a constitutional appeal.

  Grèce , n o 44035/05, § 23, 22 mai 2008 et Brechos c. Grèce (déc.), n o   7632/04, 11 avril 2006). 20.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Lutokhin v.

    On 22 March 2009 the applicants appealed against that judgment. 8.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Zybertowicz v.

On 18 March and 13 May 2003 the hearings were postponed at the applicant’s request. 29.

    La Cour constate que ce grief n’est pas manifestement mal fondé au sens de l’article 35 § 3 de la Convention.

The principal discrepancies may be summarised as follows. 8.

    The Court may only deal with the matter after all domestic remedies have been exhausted, according to the generally recognised rules of international law ...” 64.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Skachkov v.

    In a letter of 12 March 2001 a deputy prosecutor of the Udmurtiya Republic confirmed that the disclosure of the case file to the mass media had been in compliance with Article 139 of the

Jebens ,   Mr   G. Malinverni, judges , and Mr S.

In addition, the issue concerned a matter of public interest at the time.

  On 31 May 2004 the applicants' representatives informed the Court that the first applicant had “disappeared”. They claimed that in April 2004 he had been in Moscow.

No one may be detained longer than forty-eight hours before the court decision is taken.”

    On 7 May 2007 the Court decided to give notice of the application to the Government.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Sadulayeva v.

Jebens, judges , and Mr S.

skeletonised and three others had borne obvious marks of a violent death.