CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 521 résultats pour « Isabelle THIER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC002739705

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2010

18 mai 2010

regard to the declaration submitted by the respondent Government on 11 January 2010 made with view to resolving the complaint about the length of the proceedings and requesting the Court to strike this

Page 22 sur 127

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC002747307

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2014

6 mai 2014

It transpires from the minutes of the hearings before the Assize Court that B.N. and the soldiers maintained their initial statements submitted during the investigation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD004688106

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2010

21 octobre 2010

In their decisions, the courts had referred, inter alia , to the Rules and the Decree.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0907DEC003816204

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2010

7 septembre 2010

The Commission checked the applicant's allegation that the house of his grandmother had been confiscated together with some other property, and found that this was not true.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC004110707

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2013

22 octobre 2013

However, the Court considers that this complaint should be analysed in the context of the State’s positive obligation to protect the right to life.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0422DEC000118205

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2008

22 avril 2008

The German courts thus based their decisions on the prevailing interest of the child and adduced relevant reasons to suspend the applicant's access rights.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD006456909

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2013

10 octobre 2013

Thus, the applicant company had an economic interest in the comments.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1125DEC003678006

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2008

25 novembre 2008

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1125DEC000878304

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2008

25 novembre 2008

The other alleged victims had given their testimonies under duress from the police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0517DEC000973210

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2011

17 mai 2011

This assessment of the fact was corroborated by the unanimous recommendations given by the child’s curator ad litem and by the Youth Office.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124DEC001183807

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

Thus, the applicants accepted the relevant employment offer and the joining of their contributions, believing that, in accordance with the case-law as it stood at the time (see Title C below), they would

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD001325809

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2014

16 janvier 2014

Thus the arrangement as a whole indicated that the couple wished to restrict the wedding to themselves and their guests.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104DEC002321004

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2008

4 novembre 2008

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Deputy Agent, Mr H.-J. Behrens, Ministerialrat , of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007JUD000523104

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2010

7 octobre 2010

It is not the task of the Court to decide what would have been the most appropriate way for the domestic courts to deal with this argument.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0909DEC002679204

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2008

9 septembre 2008

Further noting that the authorities were pursuing a public interest and acting within their area of competence, the court allowed the Prefect’s claim and ordered the eviction of the applicant’s family.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD003262606

Admin. suprême

3 février 2011

3 février 2011

The applicants disputed this conclusion in their appeals lodged in the framework of the proceedings. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0407DEC007680001

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2009

7 avril 2009

Submissions by the parties The Government maintained that the applicants' complaints relating to the appointment of their defence counsel and their absence from the examination of the witnesses, the notification

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207DEC001010810

Admin. suprême

7 février 2012

7 février 2012

In this regard, he relies on Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention. THE LAW 1.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2501837-2699727

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2008

2 octobre 2008

the use of the verb ‘to dream’, [thus] unequivocally praising an act of death, the cartoonist justifies the use of terrorism, identifies himself through his use of the first person plural (“We”) with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD002156507

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2013

4 avril 2013

The Court therefore considers that this matter was brought sufficiently to the attention of the domestic authorities and thus rejects the argument that the applicants failed to exhaust domestic remedies

Source officielle