Lorsque la légalité de l’arrestation se trouve subordonnée à l’existence d’un motif raisonnable de suspicion, il incombe à l’autorité défenderesse de démontrer celle-ci (Dallison v.

Lorsque la légalité de l’arrestation se trouve subordonnée à l’existence d’un motif raisonnable de suspicion, il incombe à l’autorité défenderesse de démontrer celle-ci (Dallison v.

observations carried out in connection with this enquiry that have not been disclosed;     (v)   whether any enquiries were made to trace the vehicles and/or drivers used for the first two Davidson

Sir Ronald Davidson [1996] 2 New Zealand Law Reports 278, particularly at 290 (per Cooke P.); Dissenting Opinion of Justice Wald in (United States) Princz v.

    The applicant noted that the photograph showing the President of Cyprus on a motorbike had been taken at a State Fair in May 1996 at the Harley Davidson stand.

Stefano Davidson (hereinafter S.D.), a journalist, on behalf of the applicant. The applicant was eventually legally represented before the Court by Mr R. Pierro, a lawyer practising in Rome. 3.

;      (v)    whether any enquiries were made to trace the vehicles            and/or drivers used for the first two Davidson

  38668/97 , 6   January 2004, concerning the monitoring of telephone calls in a detention facility for dangerous delinquents; Davison v.   the United Kingdom (dec.), no.

In Davidovs   v. Latvia ([Committee], no.

Superintendent Bates was the senior investigating officer (“SIO”) and he was supported by DCI Davison. 18.

  37328/97, §§ 92-93, 29 January 2002; Davison v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 52990/08, 2 March 2010; and Nusret Kaya and Others v.

la possibilité d’opposer ses droits à l’enregistrement ou l’usage de la marque postérieure (même arrêt, point 43), quand bien même ce consentement résulterait implicitement des circonstances (arrêt Davidoff

  Davidyan, Ms D. Trenina and Mr K. Zharinov, lawyers practising in Moscow. 3.     The Government were represented Mr M.

  Davidyan, lawyers practising in Moscow.

Davidyan, lawyers practising in Moscow. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.

Davidyan, lawyers practising in Moscow. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were initially represented by Mr G. Matyushkin and Mr M.

Davidyan and Ms   Y.Z.   Ryabinina, lawyers practising in Moscow. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   G.

Davidyan and Ms   D.   Trenina, lawyers practising in Moscow. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.

Davidyan, a lawyer practising in Moscow. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.