David Richier, président, Mme Béatrix Peret, président, M. Stéphane Catoire, juge, Délibéré par les mêmes juges et prononcé à l'audience publique où siégeaient M.

The applicant alleged that the pre-trial judge proceedings were unfair and breached his rights guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention because they were not adversarial, took place in chambers, in his

According to the official records, the applicant was arrested because he had violated public order by illegally distributing leaflets and, when requested to stop, he had been rude towards the police.

Retenu à l'audience de la chambre du conseil du 07/01/2026 où siégeaient : Mme Béatrix Peret, juge présidant l'audience, M. Félix Mayer, juge, M.

Retenu à l'audience de la chambre du conseil du 07/01/2026 où siégeaient : Mme Béatrix Peret, juge présidant l'audience, M. Félix Mayer, juge, M.

Retenu à l'audience de la chambre du conseil du 29/04/2026 où siégeaient : Mme Béatrix Peret, présidente, M. Olivier Dubois, juge, M.

Frédéric Turbat, juge, Délibéré par les mêmes juges et prononcé à l'audience publique où siégeaient Mme Béatrix Peret, président, M.

Frédéric Turbat, juge, Délibéré par les mêmes juges et prononcé à l'audience publique où siégeaient Mme Béatrix Peret, président, M.

Frédéric Turbat, juge, Délibéré par les mêmes juges et prononcé à l'audience publique où siégeaient Mme Béatrix Peret, président, M.

Retenu à l'audience de la chambre du conseil du 22/09/2025 où siégeaient : Mme Béatrix Peret, président, M. Thierry Vitoux, juge, M.

Four hearings were adjourned because the parties amended their claims. On one occasion the proceedings were postponed because the judge was on sick leave. 9.

They were adjourned either because the parties failed to appear or because the judge was on sick leave. 7.

The State Attorney’s Office argued that the document was irrelevant because a certificate on unpaid tax liabilities could not be proof of earnings. 18.

Of these, the hearing of 6   August was adjourned until 29 October because the parties did not appear.

were adjourned because witnesses defaulted and seven were postponed due to the applicant's illness. 19.

    On 6 June 1991 the examination of the appeal was further adjourned because the applicant’s lawyer was on strike. 11.

The hearing was adjourned because Mr   E.’s lawyer was absent for a valid reason.

    On 31 October 2013 the Constitutional Court, in a formation of eight judges, dismissed without prejudice the applicant company’s complaint because its vote was tied.