CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

4 294 résultats pour « Atiback »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1114DEC001623308

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2017

14 novembre 2017

    In 2002 the applicants brought proceedings against the Moscow City Administration, seeking compensation for the damage caused by the terrorist attack.

Source officielle

Page 22 sur 215

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111049

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2012

5 avril 2012

The investigator refused to record certain statements, especially relating to the ethnic motives of the attacks.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0913JUD004257198

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2005

13 septembre 2005

This being so, as a matter of principle it may be considered necessary to punish improper attacks on objects of religious veneration (ibid.). 25.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1202DEC005595500

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2004

2 décembre 2004

On 13 October 1993 İhsan Biç was arrested by security forces in Bismil on suspicion of having participated in an attack on a military convoy, organised by the PKK.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0429DEC003936918

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2025

29 avril 2025

    The application concerns the vitriolic attack on a trade unionist in the street by unknown people, which resulted in her disfigurement and partial blindness.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142259

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

During this interview he admitted that he was a member of Fianna na h’Eireann, a proscribed Republican organisation, and had acted as a lookout during the two attacks.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12184

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2018

8 novembre 2018

It might therefore prove necessary to protect such confidence against gravely damaging attacks that were essentially unfounded, especially in view of the fact that judges who had been criticised were subject

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7060

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2000

6 juin 2000

Defence through legal assistance Denial of access to lawyer during initial stages of interrogation: violation Facts : The applicant was stopped by police in Northern Ireland shortly after an armed attack

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12932

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2020

17 septembre 2020

    Existence of a real and immediate risk to life – The domestic courts had concluded that, although, prior to the murderous attack committed by the perpetrator, there had been certain factual

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14191

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2023

3 octobre 2023

had made an assessment of the incident in the context of the surrounding circumstances, including the applicant’s prior behaviour and threats or the prison authorities’ ability to respond to prior attacks

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1184

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2009

3 décembre 2009

The applicant had been convicted of conspiring to prepare a terrorist attack in September 2001, by a group affiliated to al-Qaeda.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD000418410

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2014

16 décembre 2014

He testified that he had heard some shouting and banging on the night of the attack and had seen M. banging on doors.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711DEC004353811

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2017

11 juillet 2017

The Taliban claimed responsibility for those two attacks. 14.     Insurgent attacks increased notably after the beginning of the Taliban spring offensive, Operation Omari.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0127JUD004486204

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2011

27 janvier 2011

He and his companions had not been carrying knives and had not provoked the others' attack. 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0829JUD002527615

Admin. suprême

29 août 2023

29 août 2023

A man in civilian clothes had been giving orders to the Cossacks; he had ordered them to attack the fourth applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1127DEC003841797

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2001

27 novembre 2001

In my opinion this shows that the murderers laid an ambush before the attack.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0410JUD001325202

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2008

10 avril 2008

Z.S. reported the incident to the local police and around ten police officers went to the restaurant in search of the alleged attackers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110642

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2012

16 mars 2012

    The background of the case On 21 and 22 June 2004 the town of Nazran came under attack by a organised group of armed insurgents, which left 78 persons dead and 113 wounded. B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328DEC005841112

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2017

28 mars 2017

    On 21 July 2003 the applicant lodged a civil action with the Zagreb Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Zagrebu ) against M.M., claiming damages in connection with the physical attack on him

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12549

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2019

9 juillet 2019

It could not be said that the Russian authorities had made any genuine attempts to prevent the recurrence of violent attacks against the applicant.

Source officielle