At the hearing on 1 October 2014 the applicants, who were present and were represented by lawyers of their choice, contested the above ‑ mentioned seizure measure.

In a letter to the President, which was received by the registry on 8   October 1997, the applicants’ lawyer advised: “We would inform you that as noted in the State Legal Council’s official record

  Liška, a lawyer practising in Klatovy. The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm. A.

  Zaoral, a lawyer practising in Czech Republic. The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr   V.   Schorm.

  22200/10, §§ 50-57, 30 May 2017); a violation of Article 8 of the Convention with regard to the surveillance of communications with a lawyer (see Alimpiev v.

[M] [R] [Adresse 2] [Localité 11] Mme [I] [R] [Adresse 2] [Localité 11] Représentés par Me Clotilde Lamy de la Selarl cabinet Lamy Pomies-Richaud avocats associes, postulante, avocate au barreau

91 and 19006/91) against the Netherlands, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 4 September 1991 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Mr Johannes Schouten and Mr Hendrik Alexander

Il expose également que Maître [E] a échangé de nombreux courriels avec lui et avec le conseil du cessionnaire, le cabinet Lamy Lexel, M. [T] étant en copie.

:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 41077/04 by Alexander

His lawyer, however, was present. The Court of Appeal declared the applicant in default of appearance and started its examination.

Application no. 45158/09 Dmitri Gavrilovich KURILOVICH and others against Bulgaria lodged on 2 July 2009 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicants, Dmitri Gavrilovich Kurilovich, Maria Atanasova Kurilovich and Alexandar

requested Date of the applicant’s release from prison     60359/15 23/02/2016 Marinel-Viorel APOSTU 08/06/1976 Vasile Micu Galați 13/11/2019 19/11/2019 Signed by the mother of the applicant’s lawyer

Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] représentée par Me Morgane COURTOIS D'ARCOLLIERES de la SCP MICHEL LEDOUX ET ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : P0503 - N° du dossier 20186917 substituée par Me Alexandra

The applicants were represented by Ms Clementine Baldon, a lawyer practicing in Paris. 2.

Georgiev, a lawyer practising in Bitola. The Greek Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent’s delegates, Mr   I. Bakopoulos and Ms G.

Ms Ana TSOTSKHALASHVILI 1989 Strasbourg (France) Georgian 3. 6547/25 Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association and Meladze v.

    The applicants, Mr George Dumitrescu and Mr Alexandru Dumitrescu, are Romanian nationals, who were born in 1962 and 1994 respectively and live in Turnu Măgurele.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 8 November 1999, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Ms Alexandra Pascalidou, Mr Michael Alonzo

The presiding judge was to assess the competence of expert lay judges.