xa0;           Ndubuisi Adibe 05/12/1966 nigérian 23/03/2004                 Benson Akpan

submit a statement offering a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, Akman

category and offering a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, to Akman

Görüştüğünüz yıllarda akan kanı durdurdunuz, ateşkesleri sağladınız. Fena mı oldu?

Turkey (preliminary issue) [GC], no. 26307/95, § 75-77, ECHR 2003 ‑ VI; see   also, in particular, Akman v. Turkey (striking out), no.   37453/97, ECHR 2001 ‑ VI; Haran v.

However, this does not exclude the application of sub-paragraphs (b) or (c) without the applicant’s agreement, as his or her consent is not a criterion in this regard (see Akman v.

    The applicant emphasised that – unlike the situation in Akman v.

Turkey (preliminary issue) [GC], no. 26307/95, § 75-77, ECHR 2003 ‑ VI; see also, in particular, Akman v. Turkey (striking out), no.   37453/97, ECHR 2001 ‑ VI; Haran v.

That does not, however, rule out the possibility of applying sub-paragraphs (b) and (c), the applicant's consent not being a prerequisite for their application (see Akman v.

That does not, however, rule out the possibility of applying sub-paragraphs (b) and (c), the applicant’s consent not being a prerequisite for their application (see Akman v.

Monaco , no. 43376/06, § 63, 16   July 2009; see also, by contrast, Akman v. Turkey (striking out), no.

Oysa sağduyulu tüm insanlar biliyordu ki, bugün Kürdistan’da akan kanın tek sorumlusu Türkiye Cumhuriyeti devletidir.

Nergiz GÜNAY 10/10/1969 Bingöl   Pınar DAYAKLI 01/03/1989 Bingöl   Hanım DİLEK 10/03/1930 Bingöl   Nergiz DÖNMEZ 10/04/1965 Istanbul   Erkan DAYAKLI 01/01/1975 Elazığ   Sevcan AKCAN

Constitutional Court Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   94 68719/17 Akcan

Turkey 21/10/2020 Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 45 50616/20 Akan v.

France (dec.), no. 39288/98, 18   January 2000; and Aktan v. Turkey , no. 20863/02, §§ 27-28, 23 September 2008). 69.

nationals, Mr Mansur Yalçın, Mr   Namık Sofuoğlu, Ms Serap Topçu, Mr Ali Yüce, Mr Ali Kaplan, Ms   Eylem Onat Karataş, Mr Hüseyin Kaya, Ms Sevinç Ilgın, Mr   İsmail   Ilgın, Mr Cafer Aktan

review Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Lack of reasonable suspicion 10 80976/17 Aksan

regards the applicants who were injured (List B), and whose clinical pictures are provided in Appendix IV, it should be noted that there is no medical evidence relating to Ms Fatime Akalın, Ms Sibel Aktan