The meaning of a landowner share was a right to participate in the extraction of the minerals corresponding to one’s share, that is, financial participation was necessary in order to collect income from

Meetings on sexually transmissible disease prevention, family planning and the decriminalisation of abortion were to be held on board.

Another such report of 28 April 2016 expressed that the fragments were probably exploded pieces from artillery shells. 8.

Artists, authors, illustrators, translators and theatre people are therefore steering a wide berth around the most important meeting of cultures of our time – the meeting between Islam and the secular

Price-earnings ratios and share prices had been mentioned as well as the fact that the building industry was a good sector. She wished to pass on advice to her father.

They also submitted that it had been impossible to revive Demirbank or the shares, as the authorities had had no authority to do so. 45.

Justice Hederman held 2,812 shares in Independent Newspapers Ltd.   The total number of voting shares at the end of February 1984 was 14,935,000.

of an unlawful share support operation.

    On 10 August 2006 the applicant sold the shed to a private person T. for UAH 50,000. 11 .

the statements by the President and the Prime Minister concerning the privatisation of Kryvorizhstal and the subsequent unjustified decision of the Supreme Court to reconsider the dispute objectively shed

Luxembourg (dec.), no. 38788/97, 23 March 2000), provided that it is a “non-governmental organisation” within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention (see RENFE v.

The fact that she had to pay tax calculated on the basis of the whole best bid and not on the basis of the share of property acquired in addition to the shares she already owned constituted expropriation

the European Court of Human Rights of 1 August 2000 (final on 1 November 2000) in the case of Entleitner against Austria   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 April 2001 at the 749 th meeting

    On 19 June 2008 the applicant lodged a claim for reimbursement of the value of his share. 11.

Consequently, the applicant company lost its shares in the joint venture and the relevant part of the property which had belonged to it and for which it received no compensation.

    Can the applicants’ claim for the goods, confiscated by their predecessors, to be restored to them, be regarded as "assets" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention

  In 1984 its capital amounted to 468,000,000 drachmas and was divided into 468,000 shares of a nominal value of 1,000 drachmas each.   The applicants held 63.46% of these shares.   7.

They further sought compensation for the damage allegedly caused to a shed on the land. 6 .

price on the date of their acquisition, which was the one that featured in the annual balance sheet. 7.