This Report, which is drawn up by the Commission in accordance with Rule 54 of its Rules of Procedure, concerns the application brought by Scotts' of Greenock (Estd. 1711

    Rule 80 of the Rules of Court, in so far as relevant, provides: “1.

RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK Rules challenged by the association 25 .

the lawyer who would represent them (Rule 30).

39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having

Law – Rule 80 of the Rules of Court: The possibility of revision introduced by the Rules of Court was an exceptional procedure.

; 62   §   3 of the Rules of Court). 20.

the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 30).

    On 28 July 2020 the Court granted the applicant’s request for an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court in respect of his extradition.

39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant the applicants   anonymity   under Rule   47 § 4 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND

On 27 September 2001 the President of the Chamber, notified the Government of the respondent Party of the introduction of the application under Rule 40 of the Rules of Court.

in the Convention and its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 of the Convention and Rule   62   §   3 of the Rules of Court).

    The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).

    Rule 39 of the Rules of Court provides: “1.

39 of the Rules of Court).

and merits of the case (Rule 54   §   2   (b)). 6.

41 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant the applicant anonymity under Rule 47 § 3 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the schedule of costs submitted by the applicant and

    On 15 April 2014, the President of the Section decided, under Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court, to indicate to the Netherlands Government that it was desirable in the interest of the parties

#Franco-Spanish Convention on the protection of indications of provenance and designations of origin - Compatibility with the rules on the free movement of goods.#Case C-3/91.

. # Appeal - Competition - Rules applicable to undertakings - Letter from the Commission to the complainant - Actionable decision. # Case C-39/93 P.