The applicants complained that the search conducted in their offices and the seizure of their computers containing privileged information amounted to a violation of their rights set out in

The background of the application is a conflict of the applicant with her brother concerning access to their father.

    The applicants contested this fact contending that they were still not admitted to their workplaces. 24.

This could not have had any negative impact on the outcome of the birth. Management of the delivery was performed by [the head of the Maternity Department].

Thereafter the Norwegian authorities had refrained from implementing their deportation and had thus accepted their stay in the country.

They claimed that the Roma-only curriculum in their schools had 30   % less content than the official national curriculum.

The Court notes that the applicant has not lodged a constitutional complaint in this respect.

On 21 August 2002 the applicant and another plaintiff extended their claim. On 16 September 2002 the fourth plaintiff joined the second stage of the action.

    The Court notes that in the instant case the applicants were afforded the right to explain their personal situation orally before the judge rapporteur at the Adana Assize Court.

In 2004, on the basis of a new provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused requested that their case be brought to court or terminated.

The applicants state that, if this transfer had taken place, the 12 th school would have had from the beginning of its operation, hundreds of non-Romani students and thus would have been an ordinary school

The plaintiffs alleged that they had transferred to their son the right to buy the property and that they had paid the price. 8.

In this respect, the Contracting States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation, although the final decision as to the observance of the Convention’s requirements rests with the Court.

Accordingly, the Court confirms that the applicants were not obliged to pursue civil remedies. The objection in this regard is thus dismissed. 47.

This could be the case where both parents predominantly sought to enforce their own interests. In the present case only the applicant had demonstrated such behaviour.

  ***   The judgment is available only in French. This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court.

In that context, the court noted that this had not been contested by the applicants in their initial submissions and that the publication was about the activities of the Security Service in the Odessa

    Summary of the judgment [2]   Complaints   The applicants complained that their daughter had been taken from them and that there had thus been an interference in their family life

The Court of Appeal also stressed that, notwithstanding their “very short ‘foreword’”, the publishers had not in any sense sought to distance themselves from the text, but on the contrary had glorified