On 13 November and 19 December 1991 the High Court ordered the plaintiffs to file outstanding pleadings.

On 24 August 2000 the applicant appealed against the above judgment and decision to the High Court.

On 4 October 2006 the Prague High Court quashed the acquittal.

On 20 June 2003, the High Court, at second sift, refused the appeal.

        The High Court finds that there is no reason for rejecting       the judgment as evidence in this case.

The committee consisted of a High Court judge, a senior archivist and a vice-bishop.

    On 18 October 2019 the Supreme Court refused the applicant leave to appeal against the High Court’s judgment. 8.

However, higher education in the form of doctoral studies, which was the subject of the applicants’ complaint, had been provided in the present case by foreign universities and not by higher education

Another warning to that effect was issued by the High Court on 8 October 1997.

  47/P/2014 of the military prosecutor’s office at the High Court of Cassation and Justice.

This particular decision of the High Court is included on the list of study materials for national judges who participate in the exam for promotion to higher courts and it is also published on the High

This particular decision of the High Court is included on the list of study materials for national judges who participate in the exam for promotion to higher courts and it is also published on the High

On 28 September 2005 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law against the decision of the Higher Court of 8 June 2005.

  Proceedings before Hålogaland High Court (Lagmannsrett)         On 23 January 1986 the applicants lodged an appeal with the Hålogaland High Court.

They also lie within the Higher Whitley Conservation Area but outside the village policy area for Higher Whitley shown on the draft Vale Royal Borough Local Plan.

  On 4 October 1994 the High Court rejected the applicant’s requests.

of the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine if they are challenged on the following grounds: 1)     in case of use by the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine of a law or other normative legal act

The request was refused by the State Administration in a decision that was ultimately upheld by the High Court.

On 29 May 2013 the High Court upheld it.