CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

12 591 résultats pour « Germanaz »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1977:52

CJUE

22 mars 1977

22 mars 1977

#Steinike & Weinlig v Federal Republic of Germany.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main - Germany.#Case 78-76.

Source officielle

Page 21 sur 630

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0922DEC002852605

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2005

22 septembre 2005

Germany (dec.), no. 58388/00, 28 September 2000; and Dragan v. Germany (dec.), no. 33743/03, 7 October 2004).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56298

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2003

20 octobre 2003

font-family:Arial } Resolution ResDH(2003)163 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 27 February 2003 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Axen, Teubner and Jossifov against Germany

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1020DEC004389198

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 1998

20 octobre 1998

    The applicant entered Germany in July 1996. On 18 July 1996 he filed a request for asylum.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5090

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2002

5 décembre 2002

, of a gift made to a religious association: inadmissible The applicant is a religious association formed in the German Democratic Republic (GDR) in February 1990.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0319JUD001175585

Admin. suprême

19 mars 1991

19 mars 1991

  Mr Stocké claimed to be the victim of collusion between the German authorities and Mr Köster for the purpose of bringing him back to the Federal Republic of Germany against his will with a view

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1982:144

CJUE

6 mai 1982

6 mai 1982

#Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft contro Repubblica federale di Germania.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale: Bundesverwaltungsgericht - Germania.#Misure di salvaguardia - conserve di funghi.#Causa 126/81.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005720221

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2023

13 juin 2023

    On 25 December 2019 during the family’s stay in Bulgaria on holiday, V.K. informed the applicant that she was not going back to Germany with A. The applicant left for Germany. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109DEC003759597

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 1999

9 novembre 1999

  THE FACTS     The applicant [Mr Peter Döring] is a German national who was born in 1946 and lives in Magdeburg (Germany).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0902JUD004634406

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2010

2 septembre 2010

Germany (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-139685

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2013

25 novembre 2013

The applicant and her husband went to Germany in 1991. The husband was granted refugee status but the applicant’s own application for asylum was refused.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0916DEC007082601

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2004

16 septembre 2004

The applicants are the owners of special social bonds ( Sozialpfandbriefe ) that the German Government issued in the 1950s.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9301

Admin. suprême

27 février 2014

27 février 2014

co-accused tried separately: Article 6 §   2 applicable ; no violation Facts – The applicant was the founder of a Turkish TV station whose programmes were broadcast in Turkey and Germany and the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-98

Admin. suprême

7 février 2012

7 février 2012

Two series of photographs, published in German magazines in 1993 and 1997, had been the subject of litigation in the German courts that had led to leading judgments of the Federal Court of Justice in 1995

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110887

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

He said that the plane would land in a European country other than Germany, but that the applicant would eventually continue on to Germany.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0301JUD005868112

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2018

1 mars 2018

He left Germany for Italy with a German national with whom he had started a relationship. In January 1999 he moved on to Spain, where he worked as a cook and waiter in various restaurants. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12714

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

In 2006 the latter left Germany to take her daughter on holiday to Lithuania but never came back.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1013DEC001177785

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 1986

13 octobre 1986

  He submits that he only has a very limited grasp of the German language and cannot read German at all.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0602JUD006156108

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2016

2 juin 2016

I used to think that one could easily debate with Ganna German. I put myself in Ganna German’s position and it seemed that she must be feeling very uncomfortable.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163514

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2016

9 mai 2016

:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid }   Communicated on 9 May 2016   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 67976/11 Muzzafer DEMIR against Germany

Source officielle