Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172785
13 mars 2017
13 mars 2017
The police officers used physical force and/or special means (handcuffs, rubber truncheons) during the applicants’ arrest.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0105DEC001320507
5 janvier 2010
5 janvier 2010
During that interview SR reminded the applicant about the statement provided during the second interview, including her statement that she thought that the content of the packages was a product to be used
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203621
11 juin 2020
11 juin 2020
During the night of violence, more than 250 people were killed and more than 2,500 were injured. 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205997
16 octobre 2020
16 octobre 2020
During the night of violence, more than 250 people were killed and more than 2,500 were injured. 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182901
20 avril 2018
20 avril 2018
August 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187205
24 septembre 2018
24 septembre 2018
O., during the criminal proceedings against her.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238617
22 novembre 2024
22 novembre 2024
During his arrest, he was allegedly beaten and dragged by the police, even though his trousers had fallen off.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204705
27 août 2020
27 août 2020
lodged on 23 November 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant due to the fact that he was not assisted by a lawyer during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-191593
14 février 2019
14 février 2019
application concerns: firstly, the alleged lack of any genuine prospect of the applicant’s release in view of his life-imprisonment sentence; and, secondly, various restrictions on his right to family visits during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184732
25 juin 2018
25 juin 2018
Turkey (dec.), no. 68953/01, 30 August 2005) and the number of changes in the composition of the trial court’s bench during the trial. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-246112
21 octobre 2025
21 octobre 2025
There were breaks of between three and 70 days between the application of the punishment-cell regime during which the applicant was under normal prison regime.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-185225
2 juillet 2018
2 juillet 2018
June 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206549
9 novembre 2020
9 novembre 2020
the hearing before the Kyiv Pecherskyy District Court which lasted from about 9 p.m. on 22 March 2014 until 4.30 a.m. on 23 March 2014 and during which the applicant was allegedly held in a cage
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0414REP001445188
14 avril 1994
14 avril 1994
Sometimes staff would enter the dining-room during her visits outside meal time merely for supervisory purposes. 34.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223335
1 février 2023
1 février 2023
Türkiye 18/12/2018 Failure to comply with procedural guarantees provided for in domestic law Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159002
5 novembre 2015
5 novembre 2015
The court remained silent about the applicant’s handcuffing during the pronouncement of the judgment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410DEC004246816
10 avril 2018
10 avril 2018
It follows that during his detention in that room the applicant had approximately 3.06 sq. m of personal space. 24 .
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0409JUD003046013
9 avril 2015
9 avril 2015
The judges reiterated the statements from the victim, the witnesses and the applicant during the judicial and police investigations and during the court hearing.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD000480618
13 octobre 2022
13 octobre 2022
The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD001500719
1 décembre 2022
1 décembre 2022
The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.
Source officiellePage 21 sur 2399