authorities had decided in January 2020 – six months after he had been placed into care – that the child’s perspective was with the foster family and that assistance aimed at reunification would have been contrary

The applicant did not object to the prosecution’s reliance on the statements which she had given under oath; on the contrary, she relied on them to establish in the eyes of the jury an unwavering line

They also complained that their stay in the transit zone was contrary to Articles 5(1) and 5(4) of the Convention, submitting that their situation following their rejection at the border control had amounted

However, that was not the case as the applicants had been paid also to carry out acts which were contrary to the duties of their office, which was covered by the “old” Article 373 [§ 1].

his official position contrary to Article 182 §§ 2 (a) and (d) and 3 (b) of the Code, and abused his power as a public official holding a political post contrary to Article 332 § 2 of the Code. 30 .

If the refusal was not contrary to Article 8, they submitted as their alternative claim that it was contrary to the prohibition against discrimination enshrined in Article 14 read in conjunction with Article

If the refusal was not contrary to Article 8, they submitted as their alternative claim that it was contrary to the prohibition against discrimination enshrined in Article 14 read in conjunction with Article

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention, arising from the very existence of the constitutional arrangements according to which

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression contrary to Article   10 of the Convention (see Axel Springer AG v.

  QUESTION Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, on account of her conviction under section 7 § 2 of the Prevention

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence with his lawyer, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see, for instance, Campbell

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression contrary to Article   10 of the Convention?

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in so far as the publication of extracts of the prosecution file

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, through the authorities’ decision to remove their

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect of his correspondence with his lawyer, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see, for instance, &

complains, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, that the second-instance court’s judgment, reversing the first-instance court’s judgment rendered in her favour, lacked adequate reasoning and was contrary

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (cf. Axel Springer AG v.

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant company’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article   10 of the Convention?

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?