CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

30 676 résultats pour « Bothner »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3117

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2006

5 octobre 2006

The administrative court of appeal dismissed her arguments on both points and upheld the judgment at first instance. The Conseil d’Etat dismissed the applicant’s appeal on points of law.

Source officielle

Page 21 sur 1534

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228478

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2023

5 octobre 2023

work Altai Region Court 17/03/2021           Altai Regional Court 16/06/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-862613-884869

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2003

24 octobre 2003

  The Court also decided to carry out fact-finding missions in both countries as soon as possible (see press release no. 455) in order to take evidence from the applicants who had been extradited

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-432

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2011

19 juillet 2011

Medical reports were drawn up following further incidents in which the third applicant claimed to have been beaten up both in and outside school and in February 2010 he was diagnosed with serious eye impairment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410DEC006355716

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2018

10 avril 2018

    Both applicant companies were represented before the Court by Mr   F.   Agayev, a lawyer practising in Azerbaijan. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC000631508

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2018

25 septembre 2018

    The applicant in both cases, Mr Mustafa Cüzdan, is a Turkish national, who was born in 1992 and lives in Winschoten. In application no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243398

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2025

2 mai 2025

Relying on Articles 3, 6 and 13 of the Convention, the applicant complains of her alleged ill-treatment on account of both the officers’ use of force and the forcible medical intervention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9287

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2014

21 janvier 2014

The same lawyer acted in respect of both applications.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223232

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2023

23 janvier 2023

independent and impartial tribunal taking into account: (i) the allegations of pressure exerted by high political figures concerning the dismissal of the first applicant and (ii) the allegations by both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5190

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2002

26 septembre 2002

increased rate for “head of family” as was payable to their husbands, following a Conseil d’Etat decision (Costa case) that had established the possibility of concurrent payment to a husband and wife, both

Source officielle
TJ

6ème Chambre

69d96b08cdc6046d47d0a580

T. Judiciaire

10 avril 2026

10 avril 2026

Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries au tribunal composé de : Thomas BOTHNER, Vice-Président Gyslain DI CARO DEBIZET, Magistrat Aglaé PAPIN, Magistrat qui en ont délibéré.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD000496306

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2015

15 octobre 2015

The same standards will therefore apply to both facilities. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110554

Admin. suprême

24 février 2012

24 février 2012

Both children had been inter alia beaten on the soles of their feet with an iron rod.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3074161-3421175

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2010

1 avril 2010

(Both cases) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (length) (Both cases) Violation of Article 13 Just satisfaction: EUR 6,200, each applicant (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR   1,000, each case (costs and expenses

Source officielle
TJ

JCP

68e557c80e2901d10fa35430

T. Judiciaire

6 octobre 2025

6 octobre 2025

[Z] [L], demeurant [Adresse 4] représentée par Me Irénée DE BOTTON, avocat au barreau de LILLE dont la juridiction a été saisie par acte introductif du 28 Juin 2024 Le Juge du tribunal judiciaire

Source officielle
TA

2ème Chambre

DTA_2204274_20250519

Administratif

19 mai 2025

19 mai 2025

requérant, de division en vue de construire, est de nature à compromettre les objectif du PADD compte tenu de sa localisation en " zone bleue " et que son extrémité la plus lointaine du " vallon de Bottin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-490

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2011

7 juin 2011

hereditary illness to obtain genetic screening of embryo prior to implantation: communicated   In 2006, after their first child had been born with cystic fibrosis, the applicants learned that they were both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-200970

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

Reference is made, in particular, to discrepancies regarding the actual circumstances of both test purchases, R.s flat’s search and the seizure of the banknotes in various statements of officer D. and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211557

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2021

6 juillet 2021

Both the judge of first instance and the court of appeal rejected the request on the grounds of a possible conflict of interest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173244

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2017

30 mars 2017

Both applicants were charged with insulting the police and resisting arrest but were subsequently acquitted by the courts which found the charges unfounded.

Source officielle