Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209984
13 avril 2021
13 avril 2021
She has one more child, born in 2002 from a previous relationship. The applicant submits that he shares responsibilities as to the upbringing of all three of the children with her.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242628
3 mars 2025
3 mars 2025
During an unannounced demonstration that took place on 31 January 2020, the applicant poured a black substance, resembling oil, on the steps leading to the entrance of an office building of Shell.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0401DEC005035799
1 avril 2004
1 avril 2004
On 12 September 1997 the general meeting of shareholders of DCB AD resolved to increase the bank's capital from BGL 1,404,480,000 to BGL 20,000,000,000 through the issuing of 18,595,520 new shares
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224906
24 avril 2023
24 avril 2023
In particular, the authorities were aware of and involved in the transfer of the disputed property by the Federation of Independent Trade Unions to the applicant company’s share capital in October 1991
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237444
16 septembre 2024
16 septembre 2024
According to the applicant, on 6 December 2019 he was shot by the Azerbaijani border officers located on the Azerbaijani territory while he was herding sheep on the Georgian territory.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229059
2 novembre 2023
2 novembre 2023
Has there been an interference with the applicant company’s right to respect for home and correspondence, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, as a result
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC003173796
23 février 1999
23 février 1999
s shares to S. He also agreed to give up some of the rights guaranteed to him by the agreement signed on 23 May 1986. In 1987 company F.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1118DEC001748708
18 novembre 2010
18 novembre 2010
The applicant had always (that is, since 24 April 1992) been able to freely dispose of her co-ownership share provided that she did not infringe other people’s rights.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0909DEC000018402
9 septembre 2004
9 septembre 2004
Initially she maintained that the visit had been purely for the purpose of fact-finding; that neither she, nor the police had done anything to cause the meeting to be stopped; that Kuznetsov stopped the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC003105204
13 septembre 2016
13 septembre 2016
On 14 March 2003 the second applicant signed a contract selling his shares to the company. 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC002255105
13 décembre 2011
13 décembre 2011
that her savings were transferred to the off-shore bank without her consent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0706DEC004123798
6 juillet 2000
6 juillet 2000
G.C. and D.C. had alleged that the applicants had failed to honour a promise to sell shares to them.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC004377505
24 juin 2008
24 juin 2008
Baťa, under which the shares had been sold by the former to the latter.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-163071
4 mai 2016
4 mai 2016
The applicant was entitled to a number of shares in two companies owned by her ex-husband. In 1996 she brought a civil action seeking to have her shares redeemed by one of the companies.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1214JUD000143402
14 décembre 2006
14 décembre 2006
in common in order to protect his ownership of his own shares.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1212DEC001624490
12 décembre 1991
12 décembre 1991
A meeting took place in July 1989, but the applicant states that no answer to his correspondence complaints has as yet been received.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0629JUD007690001
29 juin 2006
29 juin 2006
’ assessment that the latter meeting was a popular ceremony within the meaning of section 5 of the Assembly Act and therefore did not require authorisation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0311DEC004518004
11 mars 2008
11 mars 2008
The applicants’ mother owned a share in an agricultural cooperative in Lučany. On 12 August 1993 she died.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0621JUD000573414
21 juin 2018
21 juin 2018
The applicant company purchased and kept shares in deposit, predominantly shares in the IF company (hereafter – “IF”), for third parties.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831JUD003770617
31 août 2023
31 août 2023
While she claimed that the land underlying and attached to the house in question was also in her shared ownership, she did not specify the size of any such share.
Source officiellePage 20 sur 238