CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

868 résultats pour « Sebastien TO »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0530DEC004851222

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2024

30 mai 2024

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

Page 20 sur 44

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1017DEC001625922

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2024

17 octobre 2024

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1017DEC001826423

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2024

17 octobre 2024

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1124DEC004651616

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2022

24 novembre 2022

THE LAW Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1387575-1448799

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2005

29 juin 2005

to which they had been parties.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1010DEC006512001

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2002

10 octobre 2002

In a registered letter of 12 April 1984, the applicant informed the tenant that he intended to terminate the lease on expiry of the term and asked her to vacate the premises.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1117DEC000610707

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2015

17 novembre 2015

to be struck out.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118238

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2013

7 mars 2013

under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide to by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0316DEC005494915

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2017

16 mars 2017

The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1204DEC002426721

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2025

4 décembre 2025

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD003921922

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2024

24 octobre 2024

to award the sums indicated in the appended table. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1010JUD001489621

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2024

10 octobre 2024

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD005422522

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2024

24 octobre 2024

The Court sees no reason to depart from that finding in the present case as, in its opinion, the Government failed to demonstrate that the remedy they referred to satisfied the criteria established in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0615JUD001361012

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2021

15 juin 2021

grave crime – up to twelve months.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212DEC000579111

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

The sums referred to above, which are specified in the appendix to the decision, are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-877166-900403

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2003

18 novembre 2003

An application by the applicants to the same investigating judge to have that order set aside and an appeal to the Madrid Audiencia Provincial were dismissed, the latter on 22 February 1999.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921DEC003939814

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2017

21 septembre 2017

THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0530DEC004149422

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2024

30 mai 2024

Răduleţu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 11   August 2022, Having regard to the declaration submitted by the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD001913320

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2024

24 octobre 2024

to award the sum indicated in the appended table. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0602DEC004025216

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2022

2 juin 2022

THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Source officielle