AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0923DEC005398400
23 septembre 2003
23 septembre 2003
This allegation, which undoubtedly damages the honour of the civil party, is moreover aggravated by the connection made between the case of Mr Papon – who has been committed for trial before the Gironde
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0925DEC006952901
25 septembre 2003
25 septembre 2003
applied Article 333 of the Code of Civil Procedure according to which judgments could be re-considered in case of discovery of significant circumstances which were not and could not have been known to the party
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1002DEC005426800
2 octobre 2003
2 octobre 2003
According to the Government, the “new” Qufaj Co sh.p.k, the applicant before the Court, is not the same company as that which was a party to the national proceedings, not only because the company did not
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4669
2 octobre 2003
2 octobre 2003
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4657
7 octobre 2003
7 octobre 2003
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1014DEC004979099
14 octobre 2003
14 octobre 2003
Partly inadmissible;Partly admissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1021DEC004231798
21 octobre 2003
21 octobre 2003
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC007380201
13 novembre 2003
13 novembre 2003
In spite of this transfer, the Court points out that she remained a party to the proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC004521499
13 novembre 2003
13 novembre 2003
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC005017899
13 novembre 2003
13 novembre 2003
A party to criminal or civil proceedings may solicit the intervention of such officials for a review.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331DEC004641299
31 mars 2005
31 mars 2005
the applicant was taken into custody by policemen from the Anti-Terrorism Branch of the Diyarbakır Security Directorate on suspicion of his membership of an illegal organisation, namely the Workers' Party
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331DEC005463200
31 mars 2005
31 mars 2005
A party to criminal or civil proceedings could solicit the intervention of such officials for a review.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0405DEC003218602
5 avril 2005
5 avril 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0405DEC001824902
5 avril 2005
5 avril 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0426DEC007442001
26 avril 2005
26 avril 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0428DEC003313202
28 avril 2005
28 avril 2005
The applicant concludes that there was a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) in that he was not afforded an opportunity to have knowledge of, and to comment on, the observations filed by the other party
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0503DEC003453902
3 mai 2005
3 mai 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512DEC004838099
12 mai 2005
12 mai 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512DEC004543799
12 mai 2005
12 mai 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3871
12 mai 2005
12 mai 2005
persons after nationalisation could be recovered by the former owners or their heirs if the third person in question had become owner in breach of the law, by virtue of their position in the Communist party
Source officiellePage 20 sur 633