CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0612JUD002283218
12 juin 2025
54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia , no.
Page 20 sur 50
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605DEC001932807
5 juin 2012
date and the court’s name) Sums offered by the Government (in euros) 1. 19328/07 BOGOVIN , Viktor Grigoryevich, 1935 26 April 2007 13 July 2006, Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk 630 2. 44546/07 KORNEYEVA
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD005618118
12 septembre 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD000665920
15 décembre 2022
suspect in order to prepare an administrative offence record in the absence of any exceptional circumstances or necessity justifying the arrest and detention as required by the national legislation (see Korneyeva
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD002819517
22 janvier 2026
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Korneyeva v. Russia , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0226JUD002357122
26 février 2026
Russia , nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD006206808
2 mai 2017
a delay of less than one year in payment of a monetary judicial award was in principle compatible with the Convention, while any longer delay was prima facie unreasonable (see, among many others, Kosheleva
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD001790820
6 mars 2025
In the leading case of Korneyeva v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188045
8 novembre 2018
Russia 13/10/2015, 11:55 Rostov-on-Don, Korolev Avenue FSKN 13/10/2015, 12:00 FSKN van, near Korolev Avenue, Rostov-on-Don The applicant was allegedly kicked and punched FSKN officers 14/10/2015
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0615JUD003008411
15 juin 2021
By a decision of 4 February 2013, upheld on appeal on 24 June 2013, the Korolev Town Court of the Moscow Region allowed Mr K.’s claim.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1105DEC003307709
5 novembre 2019
assessment of the minimum level is relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case, including the applicant’s subjective perception and what was objectively at stake in a particular case (see Korolev
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1206JUD004299113
6 décembre 2018
As the request is in line with its case-law, the Court sees no reason to refuse it (see, among other authorities, Petr Korolev v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1010DEC003129422
10 octobre 2024
The Court also takes note of the principles developed in its case-law concerning the criterion of “significant disadvantage” (see Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD003807021
18 janvier 2024
ECLI:CEDH:001-127205
16 septembre 2013
Bulgaria (nos. 47797/99 and 68698/01, §§ 34-55, 12 January 2006) and Sivova and Koleva v. Bulgaria (no. 30383/03, §§ 57-60, 15 November 2011).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD004504406
12 décembre 2017
Mr Korolev’s application 37. The applicant was born in 1988 and lives in Diveyevo in Nizhniy Novgorod Region. 38.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628DEC002157805
28 juin 2011
CHERNYSHOV 04/06/1962 Natalya Nikolayevna GARMONOVA 21/11/1961 Nadezhda Arkadyevna GLAZKOVA 14/12/1963 Valentina Vladimirovna ISAYEVA 22/03/1957 Anfisiya Petrovna KOLESNIK 13/06/1950 Lyudmila Aleksandrovna KOROLEVA
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612DEC004330208
12 juin 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606JUD008352717
6 juin 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123JUD000071118
23 novembre 2023
Russia , nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, concerning various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty and Korneyeva v.