submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Aleksandr Grigoryevich Filatenko, is a Russian national, who was born in 1961 and lives in the town of Kyzyl

’intérêt à agir des groupements, la jurisprudence judiciaire tend légitimement à garantir la sécurité juridique des accords conclus entre personnes privées lesquels ont normalement un effet «   inter

In the case of Dekany v.

way of a Law Decree in 2013. 6 .

He maintained, inter alia, that he had not been informed by the courts in due time about the possibility of having a legal-aid lawyer appointed to his case.

In the Government’s view such an application is an effective remedy.

national, born in 1944 and living in Vienna.

The letter contained, inter alia, the following statements: “Since you have not succeeded, comrade prosecutor, to attain your aims in one area, you intensively continue, in accordance with the practice

in professional help in evaluating such testimonies.

loués soit régi par les dispositions des articles L.433-1 et L433-2 et R.433-1 à R.433-7 du Code des procédures civiles d’exécution; - condamner solidairement, à défaut in solidum, M.

They claimed, inter alia , that the elements on which the Government had based their decision had not been established in adversarial proceedings.

in all instances.

    The applicant was born in 1984 and lives in Bălți. 6.

Jugement du 13 DECEMBRE 2019 CONSEIL DE PRUD'HOMMES - FORMATION PARITAIRE DE MONTPELLIER N° RG F 18/00257 APPELANTE : SASU U LOGISTIQUE [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] Représentée par Me Philippe GARCIA

personnes vivant sous son toit avec, au besoin le concours d'un serrurier et l'assistance éventuelle de la force publique, Ordonner le transport et la séquestration des meubles et objets mobiliers garnissant

EN RÉTENTION ET SUR LA PROLONGATION D’UNE MESURE DE RÉTENTION ADMINISTRATIVE Nous, Fabrice RIVES, vice-président désigné par le président du tribunal judiciaire de TOULOUSE, assisté de Amandine GAUCI

The Regional Court found, inter alia, that the applicant himself had admitted receiving 100,000 ATS from the K. bank and that it was therefore unnecessary to obtain the report of an expert in graphology

In the case of Loizou v.

1943 and lives in Košice.