font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 4 December 2018   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 12380/18 TRADE UNION OF GERMAN

seized by the German Reich and located in the former GDR: inadmissible   Article 14 Discrimination Impossibility to obtain delivery of possession of property seized by the German Reich and located

delivered on 21 February 1984 and 23 October 1984 and transmitted the same days to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that the case originated in an application against the Federal Republic of Germany

    Further developments On 20 May 2002 the applicant married a German national of Turkish origin, who lives in Germany. On 28 December 2003 a child was born to the couple.

Germany (dec.) no. 46165/99, 19 June 2003).

relative à une saisine de la société SEMATEC contre les pratiques de la société Newell Window Fashions Germany (Gmbh)

relative à la prise de contrôle exclusif de la société SGS Industries par la société SPIE Germany Switzerland Austria

lodged on 21 May 2007, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Ernst Sakewitz, is a German

He entered Germany in 2005 and requested asylum, but was arrested and detained pursuant to a Turkish request for his extradition.

GERMANY   11 July 2006   The European Court of Human Rights will be holding a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on Tuesday 11 July 2006 at 2.30 p.m.

Germany (see Klose and Others v.   Germany (dec.), no. 12923/03, 25 September 2007) and Ritter v.   Germany (see Ritter v. Germany (dec.), no. 31102/04, 20 November 2007). THE LAW I.

M., the applicant's son-in-law, resident in Germany.

From the applicant’s point of view the actions or inactions of the German KFOR contingent fell within the jurisdiction of Germany under Article 1 of the Convention, since the German contingent exercised

The domestic courts concluded that the State’s interests in removing the applicant outweighed the latter’s interest to remain in Germany.

Germany [GC], no. 9300/07, 26 June 2012).

paid by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany.

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Deputy Agent, Mr H. Behrens, Regierungsdirektor , of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

Under the terms of the Treaty, the Property Act was to continue to subsist in the unified Germany after the unification of the two German States on 3   October   1990.

He is currently residing at Jork, Germany. He is a physicist by profession.

  Two of their four children are living in Turkey, the other two, one of whom is handicapped, are living in Germany.