The applicant, Mr Mikhail Serezhayevich Ovakimyan, is a Russian national who was born in 1974 and lives in Balakovo, a town in the Saratov Region.

of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings 3,500   58203/21 27/11/2021 Vladimir Yevgenyevich NIKONOV 1963 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Balakovo

the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   58203/21* 27/11/2021 Vladimir Yevgenyevich NIKONOV 1963 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Balakovo

    56112/22* 20/11/2022 Nadezhda Viktorovna UTKINA 1986 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Manifestation against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative

by the final decision of the Moscow City Court on 23/06/2022   55460/22* 03/11/2022 Pavel Sergeyevich PROSKURYAKOV 2000   Aleksandr Aleksandrovich SHABANOV 1989   Natalya Andreyevna Baranova

enforcement proceedings 2005 End of enforcement proceedings 16/10/2014     BALTAGA Zinaida 1932   Start of enforcement proceedings 2005 End of enforcement proceedings 01/08/2013     BARANOVA

interference with the right to reputation, and inability to forge and maintain relationship with others in the professional and social sphere     9692/24 28/03/2024 Natalya Vladimirovna BARANOVA

view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Moscow City Court, 05/09/2022, fine of RUB 15,000 3,900   54409/22 19/10/2022 Anton Viktorovich DYATLOV 1997 Baranova

  Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Ivanovo; final decision: Ivanovo Regional Court, 25/08/2021, fine of RUB   10,000 4,000   22656/22 28/03/2022 Sergey Gennadyevich ROSS 1986 Baranova Natalya Andreyevna

impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   29348/22 14/05/2022 Stepan Vladimirovich SAMOYLENKO 1993   Natalya Andreyevna Baranova

(1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   29348/22 14/05/2022 Stepan Vladimirovich SAMOYLENKO 1993 Baranova

Tverskaya, 24/02/2022, Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final decision taken by the Moscow City Court on 09/06/2022 5,000   55441/22 22/10/2022 Irina Zimilovna VLADIMIRSKAYA 1970 Baranova

19/07/08 Lazarenko Tatyana Mikhaylovna 1953 Elektrostal Town Court 15/09/06 31/03/08 39532/08 02/08/08 Khrisova Antonina Dmitriyevna 1957 Elektrostal Town Court 20/11/06 14/03/08 39601/08 02/08/08 Baranova

However, this was not the case and in the absence of any indication to the contrary, the Court accepts that no audio-recording of the operation existed (see and compare Bannikova v. Russia , no.

tournant vers les faits de la cause, la Cour se penchera d’abord sur l’existence en l’espèce d’une provocation policière, compte tenu des critères établis dans sa jurisprudence (voir, en ce sens, Bannikova

arguable complaint of incitement in the applicant’s case have constituted a substantive defence under domestic law, given grounds for the exclusion of evidence or lead to similar consequences (see Bannikova

to whether they had had a good reason for mounting the operation of 17   July 2006 and to demonstrate that they had been “essentially passive” (see, for a summary of the relevant principles, Bannikova

xa0; 1969   Sofia Georgi Stefanov Andonov   1948   Sandanski Kiril Serafimov Tilev   1951   Sandanski Yordan Petrov Berbatov   1937   Blagoevgrad Slavcho Vangelov Barakov

    Date/place: 21/03/08, during arrest at Baranova street, Zhytomyr 2.