basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, Aleksentseva and Others cited above and Akman

Türkiye 27/10/2020 Mevlüt TORUK 1959 Bolu Turkish Hamdi Kenan SEVİNÇ 139. 50616/20 Akan v. Türkiye 23/10/2020 İsmail Deniz AKAN 1990 Samsun Turkish   140. 50844/20 Abanoz v.

Türkiye 23/03/2022 Yakup ARSLAN 1968 Bursa Turkish 238. 16585/22 Aktan v. Türkiye 17/03/2022 Yasin AKTAN 1992 Isparta Turkish 239. 16630/22 Sucu v.

category and offering a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, to Akman

That does not, however, rule out the possibility of applying sub-paragraphs (b) and (c), the applicant’s consent not being a prerequisite for their application (see Akman v.

lesquelles la requérante a reçu des coups et qu'elles n'ont donné aucun élément factuel précis permettant de vérifier la proportionnalité de la force utilisée par les policiers contre l'intéressée ( Ahmet Akman

basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, Aleksentseva and Others cited above and Akman

category and offering a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, Akman

Ms Semra Akan, who was born in 1988, resides in Izmir. Mr İbrahim Acar, who was born in 1970, resides in Izmir. Mrs Makbule Acar, who was born in 1965, resides in Izmir. [1] .

/05/2014 13/05/2014 61442/00+ ACUNBAY 31/05/2005 31/08/2005 38372/06+ ADIYAMAN ET ERMAN 26/10/2010 26/01/2011 77331/01 AĞDAŞ ÇETIN 19/09/2006 19/12/2006 23480/06 AKALIN 23/11/2010 23/02/2011 8076/08 AKAN

    38580/09 22/06/2009 Kayhan AKAN 01/01/1982 Kocaeli   İnan AKMEŞE 30/10/2008 29/12/2008 a) 15 days’ solitary confinement b) two-months ban on participating in certain activities Going

Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by four Turkish nationals, Ms Derya Gazioğlu, Mr   Burhan İlgün, Mr Hacı Badem and Mr Akan

Türkiye 07/08/2021 Kazım YEŞİL 1963 Antalya Turkish 6. 40606/21 Akkan v. Türkiye 04/08/2021 Osman AKKAN 1974 Mersin Turkish 7. 40624/21 Balta v.

Belgique , n o 67957/12, § 49, 13   mars 2018, et Akhan c. Turquie , n o 34448/08, § 23, 31 mai 2012).

05/2014 13/05/2014 61442/00+ ACUNBAY 31/05/2005 31/08/2005 38372/06+ ADIYAMAN AND ERMAN 26/10/2010 26/01/2011 77331/01 AĞDAŞ ÇETIN 19/09/2006 19/12/2006 23480/06 AKALIN 23/11/2010 23/02/2011 8076/08 AKAN

Turkey (no. 76855/01) Akkan and Erkızılkaya v. Turkey (no. 48055/99) Kürkçü and Others v. Turkey (no. 7142/02) Terece v. Turkey (no. 41054/98) Üstücan and Others v.

L’examen de ce grief ne permet donc de déceler aucune apparence de violation de l’article 6 de la Convention ( Akan c.   Turquie (déc.), n o   39444/98, 30 mars 2000, Barım c.

    The applicant Özlem Aktan, the executive director of Ülkede Özgür Gündem and Gündem , was similarly prosecuted.

category and offering a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, Akman