CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC002305703
6 mars 2007
81 § 3 of the Code in conjunction with Article 80(3) and (5) thereof).
Page 2 sur 1787
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD002305703
22 janvier 2009
If the proceedings were discontinued, the claim was not examined, but could be brought separately in a civil court (Article 64 § 3 of the 1974 Code, as worded both before and after June 2003, presently
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD003279407
15 décembre 2015
He essentially argued that the measures complained of were in breach of Article 64 § 3 of the Constitution (see paragraph 59 below) and that they amounted to an excessive restriction of his ownership rights
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014DEC001852702
14 octobre 2008
If the criminal proceedings are discontinued, the civil claim is not determined, but may be lodged separately with the civil courts (Article 64 § 3 of the 1974 Code, superseded by Article 88 § 3 of the
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-140686
6 janvier 2014
3 o le confinement des visites à un local pourvu d’une paroi de séparation transparente entre les visiteurs et le détenu, comme prévu à l’article 60, § 3; 4 o la privation partielle de l’
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705JUD004896299
5 juillet 2005
Selon l’article 64-3 de la loi n o 182/1993 sur la Cour constitutionnelle, une proposition d’abolir une loi ou sa partie peut également être introduite par un tribunal dans le cadre de ses
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0204JUD005471115
4 février 2021
» Article 62 « L’ é tat protège la maternité (...) ». Article 64 § 3 « Les jeunes, les mères (...) ont droit à une protection spéciale dans le travail ».
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000813909
17 janvier 2012
Une audience s’est déroulée en public au Palais des droits de l’homme, à Strasbourg, le 14 décembre 2010 (article 59 § 3 du règlement).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0404JUD005640212
4 avril 2018
Il exposa qu’en vertu des dispositions du droit portugais, en particulier l’article 32 de la Constitution et les articles 64 § 3 et 287 § 4 du CPP (paragraphes 28, 33 et 40 ci ‑ dessous), l’accusé
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020JUD001311207
20 octobre 2020
Article 275.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0702DEC001375088
2 juillet 1990
Le recours visait notamment les articles 64 par. 3 et 113 al.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1119JUD001852702
19 novembre 2009
If the proceedings are discontinued the claim is not examined, but may be brought separately in a civil court (Article 64 § 3 of the 1974 Code, superseded by Article 88 § 3 of the 2005 Code).
Article 62 “The State shall protect maternity ...” Article 64 § 3 “Young people, mothers ... shall be entitled to special protection at work.” 25 .
6 / 2 SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000007868787
25 novembre 1994
13 de la Constitution et de l'article 2 de l'ordonnance n° 58-1136 du 28 novembre 1958 ; Considérant que le Conseil supérieur de la magistrature, compétent en vertu de l'article 64, alinéa 3, de la Constitution
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0318JUD003879813
18 mars 2025
On 20 January 2014 the applicant company’s complaint was examined on the merits and rejected on the basis of Articles 275 to 278 of the CCP (see paragraph 70 below) and Article 64 § 3 of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0615JUD006760811
15 juin 2017
The domestic court must decide “immediately” on the measure to be imposed (Article 64 § 3). B. State liability for damage 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0916DEC003501497
16 septembre 2003
The Court found that they were in breach of Article 64 § 3 read in conjunction with Articles 2 and 31 § 3 of the Constitution and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention because they had put a disproportionately
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1129JUD000907202
29 novembre 2011
This was justified under Article 64 § 3 of the Constitution (see paragraph 59 below). The court recalled that the right of property was not an absolute right. 56.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1116DEC003501497
16 novembre 2000
The Court found that they were in breach of Article 64 § 3 read in conjunction with Articles 2 and 31 § 3 of the Constitution (and in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention) as
(c) SIAC’s findings on Article 3 32.