CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115DEC000581610
15 janvier 2013
As regards the facilities available to the applicant in the cells and common areas, as well as the health care regime in the prison, the conditions imposed on the applicant regarding activities outside
Page 19 sur 2011
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626DEC000583510
26 juin 2012
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1028JUD000333616
28 octobre 2021
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 10. Mr Chakryan (application no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412DEC003588407
12 avril 2018
They further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention and communicated to them under well-established case-law (see
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625DEC000642710
25 juin 2013
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192855
3 avril 2019
The plot of land has a well on it, which is the only source of drinking water for the applicant.
ACCO
ACCOTEXT000045820900
3 décembre 2021
Accord de méthode relatif à la procédure d’information et de consultation dans le cadre du projet de déploiement des nouveaux modes d’organisation du travail et du bureau partage, le programme Well inside
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-83643
31 octobre 2007
about the measures to comply with the judgment in the case of Morscher against Austria Introductory case summary The case concerns the excessive length of proceedings, first before the Weiler
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0123DEC002501997
23 janvier 2001
and registered on 21 February 1997, Having regard to the partial decision of 7 September 1999, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant is an Austrian national living in Weiler
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0116DEC003209896
16 janvier 2001
respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant is an Austria national, living in Weiler
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12216
23 octobre 2018
Article 10: The interference, in the form of the applicant’s criminal conviction, had been prescribed by law and pursued the legitimate aims of “maintaining the authority of the judiciary”, as well as
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002DEC000595910
2 octobre 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626DEC000691010
Chambre 1 A
6719e4eb5857dd64cbdaa47e
23 octobre 2024
[O] et la SAS WEIL-[L]-LUTZ, prise en la personne de Me [L], es qualités d'administrateur judiciaire de M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0704DEC003854497
4 juillet 2002
and Evi WEH against Austria The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 4 July 2002 as a Chamber composed of Mr C.L.
ECLI:CEDH:001-201085
17 janvier 2020
The application concerns the applicant’s reception conditions, as well as the procedure concerning the examination of his asylum application. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-54775
29 octobre 1997
sFE576133 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } RÉSOLUTION INTÉRIMAIRE DH (97) 557 DROITS DE L’HOMME REQUÊTE N o 27850/95 DAMERY-VETTER-WEIL
Ch.secu-fiva-cdas
6610e5e474ef9f00086f64e0
5 avril 2024
Pascal VERGUCHT, Conseiller, Mme Elsa WEIL, Conseiller, Assistés lors des débats de M.
Chambre civile 1-2
68f31ef847bd0e19a239d43f
8 octobre 2025
[Adresse 2] Prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représentant : Me Bertrand WEIL, Plaidant/Postulant, avocat au barreau
Conseil d'État
CETAT:CETATEXT000008180253
9 mai 2005
l'article L. 521-3 du code de justice administrative : 1°) d'ordonner au président du Conseil constitutionnel de faire délibérer à nouveau le Conseil constitutionnel, hors la présence de Mme Simone Weil