conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

No reply to these letters has been received by the Court.

No reply to these letters has been received by the Court.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

THE LAW    Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

As they failed to do so, they should not receive the amount awarded to the deceased applicant. 8.

The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

They asked the prison authorities for permission to leave the prison in order to attend the funeral.

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement.

Răduleţu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the

Case Date of the decision 52804/13+ Liliana BANDULEA and 3 other applications 19/11/2015 40102/13+ Constantin-Cristian CATANĂ and 6 other applications 19/11/2015 38056/11+ Sebastian Nicolae SECOȘAN and

lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of

No reply to these letters has been received by the Court.

an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive adequate and