et associés, notaires, anciennement dénommée " Nicolas Duchange, Jean Staelen et Christophe Duchange, notaires associés ", titulaire d'un office de notaires à la résidence à Roubaix (Nord), a demandé

In January 1998 the applicant was detained for ten hours, during which he was allegedly beaten up by the police.

    The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.

He was arrested during the so ‑ called “Nardaran events” of 26 November 2015.

Turkey 15/05/2018 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 20 24628/18 Ağgül v.

, enregistrée le 31 janvier 2024 présentée par la SCP Duchange et associés, notaires ; Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

    Has the applicant been subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article   3 of the Convention, during his stay in the Hotspot of Lampedusa, having regard in particular

It further pertains to the applicant’s inability to examine or have examined the witnesses during the criminal proceedings (see Schatschaschwili v.   Germany [GC], no.

    The Court notes that the first applicant was detained in poor conditions during transport. The details of his detention during transport are indicated in the appended table.

  The applicant complained under Article 3 that he had been ill-treated during his police custody between 11 and 19 May 1994 and during his detention on remand. 2.

Later the applicant hired another lawyer and, during the second round of questioning, rejected the charges against her and refused to make any statements.

While his handcuffs were removed during the court sessions, the leg irons were kept on him.

  m; no heating, insufficient lighting;     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings.

The applicant’s right of access to a lawyer was restricted during his police custody according to the now defunct Law   no. 3842.

During the appeal stage, the applicant was informed that the building would be demolished.

.) - 68953/01 Decision 30.8.2005 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Military judge on the bench of a state security court during part of the trial: inadmissible

  6125/21 during interrogations conducted by the military officers in connection with allegations of treason during military service.

The applicant alleges that he was shot in the leg and beaten up by gendarmes during and after one such operation in the prison where he was detained at the time.

The applicants did not specify what happened during the following days.