On 21 November 2017 the Geneva Court for Adult and Child Protection took a decision to withdraw E.’s de facto custody of the child as well as the right to determine the latter’s place of residence, to

The respondent stated that he had spoken with the child, encouraging her to go and live with her mother if she wanted, but the child had refused.

tribunal administratif de Versailles d'annuler les opérations électorales qui se sont déroulées les 23 et 30 mars 2014 en vue de l'élection des conseillers municipaux et communautaires de la commune de Chilly-Mazarin

The same day the child-welfare services arranged for the second applicant and the child to stay at a family centre, with the second applicant’s consent.

not influence the child negatively in that regard.

The applicants loved the child, but were not able sufficiently to respond to the child’s specific needs. The child primarily grew up in a state of neglect.

Further questions would have disturbed the child.

  He surrounded the child with love and attention.

          Under Scots law the parents of a "legitimate" child have the rights of guardianship in respect of their child with the consequent powers to act in the

of the child.

and the mother and the need to avoid causing the child psychological trauma, it would be inappropriate to remove the child to the other place of residence”.

Section 1754 Effect of Adoption “(1) If a married couple adopt a child or if a spouse adopts a child of the other spouse, the child attains the legal position of a child of both the spouses. (2)... (3)

The child identified the applicant as the father but did not include him in his family. The father’s ties with the child were positive but founded on limited experience and high expectations.

Together with the child she moved to her parents’ house in Kirsanov, a town in the Tambov Region. The applicant was prevented from seeing the child. 7.

the applicant, authorising him and the law-enforcement authorities to apprehend the child and ordering E.N. to surrender the child without delay.

return of the child.”

The child again refused to be separated from his father.

He did not agree to let K.P. and the child leave Italy too. 15.     In the applicant’s absence that day, K.P. ran away with the child.

of the child.