party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings - final decision: Stavropol Regional Court, 07/04/2021, fine of RUB 10,000 4,000   34006/22 24/06/2022 Margarita Aleksandrovna VAYNER 2002 Baranova

in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of proceedings     8,000   6379/22 29/12/2021 Aleksandr Vyacheslavovich BORISENKO 2002 Baranova

impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     58089/21 11/11/2021 Stanislav Timofeyevich KANEV 1988 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova

inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based   58089/21 11/11/2021 Stanislav Timofeyevich KANEV 1988   Natalya Andreyevna Baranova

in administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 09/08/2022, fine of RUB   10,000   2626/23* 08/12/2022 Vladimir Aleksandrovich FATEYEV 1978 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova

interference with the right to reputation, and inability to forge and maintain relationship with others in the professional and social sphere     9692/24* 28/03/2024 Natalya Vladimirovna BARANOVA

Navalnyy   Balakovo, Saratov Region   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Saratov Region Court 19/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of

Baranov, lawyers practising in Kaliningrad. 2.     The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   P.

Russia, no. 41261/17, §§ 78-85 and 125 ‑ 33, 9 July 2019) 12,500     37609/21 14/07/2021 Galina Ivanovna BASKAKOVA 1964   Nemova Mariya Igorevna Moscow On 08/09/2018 the applicant

Jana BALANOVÁ, who was born in 1940 and lives in Bratislava. Allan BÖHM, who was born in 1962 and lives in Bratislava. Soňa BÖHMOVÁ, who was born in 1961 and lives in Bratislava.

  Navalnyy   Balakovo, Saratov Region   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Saratov Region Court 19/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in

For more general principles concerning the problem of entrapment see Bannikova v.   Russia (no.   18757/06, §§ 33-65, 4 November 2010). 37.

detention immediately after the conviction by the first-instance court; the lodging of appeal or appeal proceedings do not offer suspensive effect 5,000   26827/20 23/04/2020 Natalya Yuryevna BARINOVA

The relevant criteria determining the Court’s examination in this context are set out in the cases of Bannikova v. Russia (no.

prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - 14 June 2018, Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan; Administrative fine of RUB 2,000. 3,900     15090/19 12/02/2019 Yekaterina Alekseyevna BAKANOVA

opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance   Finding of a violation will constitute sufficient just satisfaction   5083/22 27/12/2021 Viktor Gennadyevich BARDAKOV

  27161/22* 05/05/2022 Makar Vladimirovich SOKOLOV 1995 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Vologda, 03/09/2021, Protest against the arbitrariness of the police of Vologda article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,

protest on 27/02/2022, Nizhniy Novgorod, Article 20.2 § 8, detention of 12 days, Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 05/03/2022   22656/22* 28/03/2022 Sergey Gennadyevich ROSS 1986 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova

Lituanie [GC], n o 74420/01, § §§ 49-61, CEDH 2008, et Bannikova c. Russie , n o 18757/06, §§ 33-65, 4 novembre 2010, ont été précisés dans Matanović c.