state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 28 November 2000, having regard to Austria’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 15 December 1995 and 9 February 1996, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide

to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 15 December 1995 and 9 February 1996, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide

Government of France to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 25 February 1993, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide

respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 12 December 2000, having regard to France’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

Government of Italy to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 27 February 1992, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide

state to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 29 May 2000 and 26 June 2001, having regard to Switzerland’s obligation under former Article 32, paragraph 4, of the Convention to abide

of the respondent State to inform it of the measures taken following its decision of 9 June 1999, having regard to Spain’s obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Heng, - et les observations de Me Abidi, substituant Me Macone, représentant M. A. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

C F, agissant tant en leur nom personnel qu'en qualité de représentants de l'enfant mineure D E, représentés par Me Abida, demandent au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision implicite par laquelle la

B..., représentée par Me Abidi, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 20 février 2025 par lequel le préfet de la Vendée a refusé de lui délivrer un titre de séjour, lui a fait obligation de

LES APPELS : Appel a été interjeté par : Monsieur ABIDI C..., le 13 Avril 2007 M. le Procureur de la République, le 13 Avril 2007 DÉROULEMENT DES DÉBATS : A l'audience publique du 11 Décembre

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme B, - et les observations de Mme D, élève avocate, assistée de Me Abidi, représentants M.

government of the respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment, having regard to its obligation under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

Government of Germany to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 16 December 1992, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide

of the measures taken following its decisions of 13 September 1996 and 15   November 1996, having regard to Italy’s obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide

Government of Sweden to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 23 October 1990, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide

to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 9 February 1996 and 22 March 1996, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide