Her application for membership was rejected as she had been married at the time the application for membership was lodged. She appealed and then filed a complaint with the Constitutional Court.

Article 70 provides that a tenant is entitled to share his home with his spouse, children and parents or other persons living with him as members of his family.

    Did the applicant have a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning his shares in the companies at the time of their sale by tender to the

S.Ö. told the [prosecutor] that he had found an old [mortar shell] two years ago, which he had placed on the roof of the station, and that he did not know how the [mortar shell] had ended up at the scene

    In 2000 the first applicant purchased 13.15% of the shares of the company and in 2003 she donated all her shares to the second applicant.

On 4 February 1991 the employees (including the applicant, who was the manager of the Copyright Agency) had paid a certain amount of money to the State in exchange for its share in the company.

ZSa 1058/00, Sa 2081/B) On 8 April 1998 a meeting of the council of creditors of Slovenské telekomunikácie, š.p. was held in the presence of a notary public.

Until 1997 the State owned all shares in the first applicant.

The appellate court held that, while the injunction in respect of the applicant company’s shares was a justifiable measure for securing evidence (given that the shares might have been the object of the

All three of them together held a certain amount of shares in Pamukbank T.A.Ş. (hereinafter “Pamukbank”).

    The applicant inherited a one-third share in an unlimited company and some real estate when his father died in 1975.

him “his share” the following day.

shares of the whole land of the CAE in hectares but without specific physical location and definition of boundaries.

The applicant company invested into a geothermal power plant in Croatia operated by the Croatian company Geoen d.o.o. and thereby acquired an 80% share in that company.

Under the terms the loan, the share was subject to a restriction on resale according to which the applicants were obliged to offer the share to the local authority first.

considered that the breach of the electoral legislation by the applicant had been serious enough to have had a significant impact on the final outcome of the elections, given the important number of shares

Due to a conflict with M., her sister, she moved to live with her under-age son in the ten-sq.m. stable adjoining the house.

They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule   80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

It maintained, in particular, that with her behaviour she had contributed to the overall length of the proceedings.

The applicant alleges, without providing any details, that she was not allowed to bid at the auction, although she informed the State bailiffs that she was interested.