AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5178
26 septembre 2002
26 septembre 2002
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926DEC006373700
26 septembre 2002
26 septembre 2002
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1003DEC004613399
3 octobre 2002
3 octobre 2002
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112DEC003422196
12 novembre 2002
12 novembre 2002
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1205DEC003705997
5 décembre 2002
5 décembre 2002
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018DEC004118702
18 octobre 2005
18 octobre 2005
If the person decides to participate, he or she becomes a party to the proceedings. An appeal is available against a refusal to be admitted as a party to the proceedings. § 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020DEC002577103
20 octobre 2005
20 octobre 2005
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. A. Outline of the events Since 1986 the applicant lives and works in Greece.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1025DEC006889001
25 octobre 2005
25 octobre 2005
Both parties prepared written submissions on the point.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110DEC005807700
10 novembre 2005
10 novembre 2005
The court invited the applicant to join the proceedings as a third party and to submit his views on the matter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1117DEC000084202
17 novembre 2005
17 novembre 2005
significant circumstances which were not and could not have been known to the party who applies for re-consideration;... 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124DEC001481002
24 novembre 2005
24 novembre 2005
On 3 July 2001 the Ulyanovsk Regional Court, having heard the parties, dismissed the appeal and upheld the judgment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0330DEC003323496
30 mars 2000
30 mars 2000
Particular circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6688
30 mars 2000
30 mars 2000
In this regard, the applicant submitted that the criminal proceedings against him were part of wider scale political campaign against adoptions by foreigners; he referred in particular to the fact that
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0330DEC002778595
30 mars 2000
30 mars 2000
On 4 February 2000 the Warsaw Court of Appeal, following the prosecutor’s appeal against this decision, amended it in part, considering that the proceedings in their part concerning the charges
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406DEC003377696
6 avril 2000
6 avril 2000
It follows that this part of the application cannot be rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6914
6 avril 2000
6 avril 2000
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6932
6 avril 2000
6 avril 2000
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC003862997
4 mai 2000
4 mai 2000
First of all, in order to hear a witness, an expert witness or a party, or when it is difficult for a party to present the case in writing.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7004
4 mai 2000
4 mai 2000
Although, it was true that the building company should have been liable for these works, this was a matter between two private parties which had been dealt with by the civil courts.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0516DEC003602297
16 mai 2000
16 mai 2000
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. A.
Source officiellePage 18 sur 93779