CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 875 571 résultats pour « Party »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5178

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2002

26 septembre 2002

Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926DEC006373700

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2002

26 septembre 2002

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1003DEC004613399

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2002

3 octobre 2002

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112DEC003422196

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2002

12 novembre 2002

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1205DEC003705997

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2002

5 décembre 2002

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018DEC004118702

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2005

18 octobre 2005

If the person decides to participate, he or she becomes a party to the proceedings. An appeal is available against a refusal to be admitted as a party to the proceedings. § 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020DEC002577103

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2005

20 octobre 2005

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. A. Outline of the events Since 1986 the applicant lives and works in Greece.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1025DEC006889001

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2005

25 octobre 2005

Both parties prepared written submissions on the point.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110DEC005807700

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2005

10 novembre 2005

The court invited the applicant to join the proceedings as a third party and to submit his views on the matter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1117DEC000084202

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2005

17 novembre 2005

    significant circumstances which were not and could not have been known to the party who applies for re-consideration;... 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124DEC001481002

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2005

24 novembre 2005

On 3 July 2001 the Ulyanovsk Regional Court, having heard the parties, dismissed the appeal and upheld the judgment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0330DEC003323496

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2000

30 mars 2000

  Particular circumstances of the case     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6688

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2000

30 mars 2000

In this regard, the applicant submitted that the criminal proceedings against him were part of wider scale political campaign against adoptions by foreigners; he referred in particular to the fact that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0330DEC002778595

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2000

30 mars 2000

  On 4 February 2000 the Warsaw Court of Appeal, following the prosecutor’s appeal against this decision, amended it in part, considering that the proceedings in their part concerning the charges

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406DEC003377696

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2000

6 avril 2000

  It follows that this part of the application cannot be rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6914

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2000

6 avril 2000

Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6932

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2000

6 avril 2000

Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC003862997

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2000

4 mai 2000

  First of all, in order to hear a witness, an expert witness or a party, or when it is difficult for a party to present the case in writing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7004

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2000

4 mai 2000

Although, it was true that the building company should have been liable for these works, this was a matter between two private parties which had been dealt with by the civil courts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0516DEC003602297

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2000

16 mai 2000

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.   A.

Source officielle

Page 18 sur 93779

← PrécédentSuivant →